Mind the Metric: Reproducibility and Fair Benchmarking of Spectral Graph Models for Collaborative Filtering
TL;DR
A reproducibility and replicability study that examines three major families of graph models, showing that strong classical methods remain highly competitive and that no single spectral model dominates across domains, and finds that spectral filtering often improves catalog exploration even when accuracy gains are marginal.
Abstract
Graph models that manipulate the frequency spectrum of user-item interactions to separate preference signals from noise often report significant improvements, but concerns about evaluation rigor and reproducibility persist. We conduct a reproducibility and replicability study that examines three major families: (i) spectral denoising methods, (ii) graph signal processing (GSP) models, and (iii) spectral propagation approaches. Reproducing published pipelines reveals a polarized landscape: while several works are fully reproducible, others rely on flawed metric implementations and incomplete hyperparameter disclosures. In particular, we observe systematic inflation of Recall in the spectral denoising methods due to an implementation error, and theoretically invalid ranking metrics in GSP models due to unordered prediction lists; conversely, the graph filtering models are consistently reproducible. Beyond reproduction, we establish a unified evaluation protocol on four datasets with consistent splits and hyperparameter optimization for all baselines, showing that strong classical methods (e.g., SLIM, Item-kNN) remain highly competitive and that no single spectral model dominates across domains. We further analyze robustness under varying data sparsity and assess beyond-accuracy properties, finding that spectral filtering often improves catalog exploration even when accuracy gains are marginal. Our code is available at https://github.com/sisinflab/Mind_the_Metric_SIGIR-26.