PLSQLBench is the first benchmark for evaluating whether LLMs can write executable PL/SQL programs, with correctness measured through execution-based tests, and recurring difficulties in schema grounding, PL/SQL dialect fidelity, procedural control flow, exception handling, and cross-turn consistency are revealed.
Abstract
We present PLSQLBench, to our knowledge the first benchmark for evaluating whether LLMs can write executable PL/SQL programs, with correctness measured through execution-based tests. Existing LLM evaluations largely target general-purpose code generation or declarative text-to-SQL, leaving procedural database programming underexplored. PLSQLBench contains 2,865 instances: 2,594 single-turn tasks and 271 multi-turn conversations spanning 978 turns. The benchmark combines complex schema-grounded tasks over enterprise-style Spider 2 databases, simpler schema-grounded tasks derived from Spider, and MBPP-derived procedural problems, covering varying levels of database grounding and procedural complexity. Experiments with eight LLMs reveal recurring difficulties in schema grounding, PL/SQL dialect fidelity, procedural control flow, exception handling, and cross-turn consistency. Tool-augmented LLM agents improve performance on several schema-grounded evaluations, although substantial gaps remain. These results highlight procedural database programming capabilities not directly assessed by conventional code generation or text-to-SQL benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/oracle-samples/plsqlbench.
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for translating natural-language (NL) requirements into PL/SQL programs, attracting increasing attention from the database community. However, existing NL-to-PL/SQL efforts primarily focus on directly generating PL/SQL from complete NL requirements. In practice,...
Hang Zhang, Chao-Kun Wang, Yun Pan et al.· 0 citations
This work demonstrates Text2SQL-Eval, an open-source, modular framework for rigorous evaluation of text-to-SQL systems, which provides a comprehensive suite of over twelve metrics, spanning execution accuracy, SQL syntactic equivalence, and LLM-as-judge scoring.
Oktie Hassanzadeh, Yotam Perlitz, Nhan H. Pham et al.· Proceedings of the VLDB Endo...· 0 citations
This work presents AutoSQL, a system that reconstructs SQL templates from Go ORM code that constructs a Code Index, a directed graph that captures structural dependencies between functions, types, and global variables as navigable edges and synthesizes SQL templates.
Jun-Song Pu, Yi-Chen Li, Zhuang-Bin Chen et al.· Proceedings of the 41st IEEE...· 0 citations
DBLifeBench is introduced, the first benchmark to evaluate LLMs across five critical lifecycle phases: Design, Implementation, Operation, Debugging, and Maintenance, and a novel task utilizing structured reasoning graphs to mimic human iterative problem-solving is proposed.
Shunfan Zheng, Dong-Sheng Shi, Yue Li et al.· 0 citations
SemVerBench is introduced, the first benchmark of LLM version-constraint resolution semantics across three ecosystems (npm, PEP 440, Cargo), and six frontier models are evaluated: Opus significantly outperforms all other models, and Sonnet outperforms the OpenAI models (McNemar).
This work presents a training-free framework that formulates SQL correction as a plan-guided, tree-structured debugging process that mitigates error accumulation during iterative refinement and demonstrates the effectiveness and stability of the approach in real-world deployments.
Xinmei Huang, Jie Song, Peng Li et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.