Jul 2026· Quality in Sport· Vol 63, pp. 73169· 0 citations· 13 references
TL;DR
Multimodal biomarker panels integrating molecular, microvascular, and imaging data provide the most precise risk stratification, enabling timely, targeted neuroprotective interventions by rehabilitation specialists.
Abstract
Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the fastest-growing neurological disorder globally. Traditional diagnosis, which relies on motor symptoms, is associated with a 15–24% error rate and occurs after significant loss of dopaminergic neurons. Early biomarker identification is essential for biological redefinition of PD and timely intervention.Objective: To synthesize evidence from the past five years on minimally invasive biomarkers and assess whether multimodal panels offer greater diagnostic precision than single tests.Methods: A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus (January 2021–January 2026) was conducted per PRISMA guidelines, including meta-analyses and original studies on α-synuclein seed amplification assays (SAA), neuronally derived extracellular vesicles (LIEVs), neurofilament light chain (NfL), and advanced imaging (OCT-A, MRI).Results: SAA exhibited 96% sensitivity in GBA1 mutation carriers and 98.6% in hyposmic individuals with dopaminergic deficits, but only 67.5% in LRRK2 carriers. Serum LIEV-associated α-synuclein distinguished prodromal cases with high precision (AUC=0.91). NfL predicted functional decline (OR=2.54) up to five years before diagnosis. Advanced neuroimaging and skin RT-QuIC tests showed diagnostic accuracies from 82% to 100%.Conclusion: PD diagnosis is shifting from clinical observation to biological profiling. Multimodal biomarker panels integrating molecular, microvascular, and imaging data provide the most precise risk stratification, enabling timely, targeted neuroprotective interventions by rehabilitation specialists.
Multimodal fusion architectures, particularly cross-attention transformers integrating motor, voice, and gait data, consistently outperformed unimodal approaches by 4%-8% in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with the largest gains in early stage detection and differential diagnosis tasks...
Muhammad Imran Khan, A. Imran, A. Alshammari· Computational biology and ch...· 0 citations
There is a critical need for future AD research to bridge identified gaps in early detection, focus on improving early diagnosis, developing more effective treatments, refining existing drugs and therapies, and understanding the underlying disease progression mechanisms.
S. Patnaik, P. K. Patra, Chinam Niranjan Patra et al.· Central Nervous System Agent...· 0 citations
Various categories of biomarkers, including protein aggregates, inflammation-related factors, oxidative stress markers, metabolomic and lipidomic signatures, genetic and epigenetic status, and PD-related exosomes are discussed, could serve as a diagnostic tool for PD and may provide predictive measures of disease outco...
Jerly Helan Mary Joseph, Mahesh Kandasamy· International review of neur...· 0 citations
This review focuses on some of the groundbreaking advances and the immediate challenges faced by researchers, clinicians, and individuals with PD, as they collaborate to address the great-and ever-growing-clinical need in PD.
Grażyna Söderbom· International review of neur...· 0 citations
Overall, the CCD biomarker landscape supports a multimodal approach integrating Aβ dysregulation, axonal injury, and glial activation, which will strengthen the translational value of CCD as a model for human dementia, accelerating discovery and therapeutic development across species.
Klysse Assumpção Barbosa, Heloísa Máximo Ribeiro, L. Benevenuto et al.· Veterinary research communic...· 0 citations
Brief olfactory assessments, particularly those tailored to regional and cultural settings, serve as highly effective, cost-efficient, and non-invasive screening instruments for prodromal PD detection within routine neurogeriatric clinical practice.