The INCOSE future of systems engineering (FuSE) initiative is a collaborative effort to realize the
Systems Engineering Vision 2035
, pivoting from traditional, process‐driven methods to a more agile approach working with the different engineering and systems engineering disciplines, It focuses on addressing complex societal challenges through holistic, sustainable, and AI‐enabled systems engineering, creating actionable roadmaps. The The Agile Systems and Systems Engineering working group has identified eight strategic aspects, two of which are the following:
▪ Shared‐knowledge management – facilitated communication, collaboration, and knowledge curation
▪ Adaptable modular architectures – composable and reconfigurable designs from evolving variations of reusable assets
Model‐based systems engineering (MBSE) has progressed to the point that it is now ubiquitous in systems engineering. It is therefore logical that MBSE be used together with systems engineering agility in order to leverage its benefits. This article will examine how the OMG Reusable Asset Specification (RAS), the Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), product line engineering (PLE) used as part of MBSE, and agile can address these strategic aspects to enable systems engineering agility.
It is argued that systems engineering must shift from a control‐centric discipline to one grounded in disciplined adaptability, integrating agile principles, model‐based systems engineering, modular open systems architecture, and AI‐enabled capabilities to propose an adaptive systems engineering operating model for sus...
It is suggested that product line engineering (PLE) provides a structural mechanism for enabling meaningful agility in complex cyber‐physical systems by organizing solutions into stable core assets and controlled variability that explicitly respects physical and organizational constraints.
A literature review of Agile methodologies from 2001 to 2025 is presented, systematically examining their evolution, cross-sectoral diffusion, and key adaptations, and identifies critical gaps in the literature and outlines future research directions.
Majid Al-Nabae, Norshahrizan Nordin, Abdulwadod S. A. Hassan et al.· Global Social Science and Hu...· 0 citations
A comprehensive mapping of the complete productization lifecycle—from internal prototype through licensed commercial deployment—is absent from the synthesized literature on architectural practice, with recommendations for open-standard mandates and SME-targeted digitalization programs.
This study highlights how these methodologies complement each other in practice, improve software quality, reduce time-to-market, and enhance collaboration among stakeholders in modern software engineering environments.
Nkiwa Monkila Jonathan, Monkila Nkiwa Barthelemy, Padinganyi Tshiombela Faustin et al.· International journal of re...· 0 citations
The transition to circular manufacturing challenges product lifecycle management (PLM) systems, which remain optimized for linear workflows and lack integration of reuse logic. This study investigates how returned components can be systematically reintegrated into product configuration to support circularity....
Andreas Christensen, A. Jakobsen, Verena Stingl et al.· Journal of Manufacturing Tec...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.