Jul 2026· International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces· pp. 1-6· 0 citations· 34 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
KNIT-C is introduced, a conversational system that operationalises computational boundary objects within synchronous multi-user dialogue, eliciting individual viewpoints, synthesising group perspectives, and guiding discussion toward negotiated outcomes, finding that conversational engagement deepened individual reflection but created pacing and coordination challenges in group interaction.
Abstract
Conversational AI is widely explored for supporting brainstorming and creative collaboration, yet its potential to guide groups through convergence, where differing perspectives must be reconciled into a shared direction, remains largely unexamined. We introduce KNIT-C, a conversational system that operationalises computational boundary objects within synchronous multi-user dialogue, eliciting individual viewpoints, synthesising group perspectives, and guiding discussion toward negotiated outcomes. Across four public workshop sessions (14 non-expert participants), we find that conversational engagement deepened individual reflection but created pacing and coordination challenges in group interaction. AI-generated summaries anchored discussion, though their similarity demanded careful comparison rather than simplifying choices. Participants frequently reported feeling heard without fully endorsing outcomes, pointing to productive disagreement as a form of convergence that preserves visible tension rather than resolving it. We discuss implications for adaptive pacing, context-sensitive stance-shifting, and evaluation frameworks that assess whether differences were genuinely engaged rather than suppressed.
Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) is changing information seeking by combining information retrieval, response generation, and follow-up questioning within a single interaction. Conversational systems enable users to refine questions and develop an inquiry through successive turns, in contrast to traditional...
Nishant Upadhyay, Mohd Aleem Khan· International journal of art...· 0 citations
Advance directives preserve autonomy, but they involve abstract, challenging choices. Existing decision support for advance directives structures decisions rather than facilitating the articulation of preferences. This limitation points to large language model–based conversational agents (CAs) as a potential alternativ...
Ruben Albers, Marc Hassenzahl· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
Political polarization makes constructive cross-partisan dialogue increasingly difficult, and human facilitators are subject to bias and cognitive limits when tracking evolving stances in multi-party debates. We propose a Socially Interactive Agent that acts as an active mediator by fusing non-verbal cues with real-tim...
Nahuel Gómez· Proceedings of the 28th Inte...· 0 citations
The Reflective Conversational Journal operationalizes a complementary human–AI role structure in which AI supports facilitation and recording while the user retains the reflector role, providing preliminary evidence of design validity and implementation fidelity rather than objective evidence of cognitive-load reductio...
It is suggested that AI reproduces the surface of cooperation without the mutual adaptation that grounds it between humans - and, more surprisingly, that mechanisms sustaining human accommodation can run in reverse with AI, suggesting a turn-level view may be insufficient for interaction-level success.
This study focuses on the initial stages of a broader design project aimed at developing a GenAI mediator for consensus-oriented online deliberation, and derives design knowledge, articulated through design requirements, for emotion-aware GenAI mediation.
Antoine Danthine, Anthony Simonofski· EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2026· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.