Skip to content
Open access

ActivAsk: Free-Energy-Guided Clarification for Robotic Grasping Under Ambiguous Instructions

Aug 2026 · Robotics · 0 citations · 48 references

TL;DR

ActivAsk is presented, a zero-shot framework for resolving referential ambiguity before robotic grasping that selects among VLM-proposed candidate partitions using an expected free energy (EFE) criterion motivated by active inference; with neutral response preferences, this reduces to information gain over candidate partitions.

Abstract

Service robots often receive natural language instructions in changing workspaces where multiple visible objects may match one description. Relying on detector confidence, random selection, or direct vision–language model (VLM) prediction can lead to a wrong action. This paper presents ActivAsk, a zero-shot framework for resolving referential ambiguity before robotic grasping. ActivAsk constructs open-vocabulary candidates from red-green-blue-depth (RGB-D) input, asks candidate-grounded yes/no questions when needed, updates the candidate state from the user’s answer, and grasps after target resolution. It selects among VLM-proposed candidate partitions using an expected free energy (EFE) criterion motivated by active inference; with neutral response preferences, this reduces to information gain over candidate partitions. Offline experiments showed that interactive clarification improved target accuracy from about 53–54% for noninteractive baselines to about 90–92%. ActivAsk matched the best interactive accuracy (92.13%) while asking 15.47–19.71% fewer questions on asked trials and 21.43–23.88% fewer for ambiguous instructions. In online real robot experiments, ActivAsk achieved 92.98% target selection accuracy and 87.72% full correct object grasp success; unresolved or wrong targets were not physically executed after operator-controlled verification and were counted as task failures.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

MIGU: Multimodal Instruction Grounding under Uncertainty for Manipulation Planning

Understanding natural human instructions is crucial for deploying robots in human-centric environments. We study multimodal instruction grounding, where language and gesture provide complementary but uncertain cues. We present MIGU, a modular framework that combines semantic and geometric evidence into a unified ground...

Ming-Ke Lu, An-Xing Xiao, David Hsu · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

MS-MEM: Multi-Skill Manipulation-Enhanced Mapping via Uncertainty- and Disturbance-Aware Action Selection

Experimental results show that, compared with single-skill and unconstrained baselines that ignore scene disturbance, MS-MEM achieves higher mapping accuracy while substantially reducing scene disturbance, highlighting the synergistic effects of active viewpoint selection, push, and grasp actions.

Yi-Tian Shi, Jesper Mücke, Nils Dengler et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Robo-Harness K1: Harnessing Robot-Use Agents via Perception Augmentation

Robo-Harness K1 is introduced, a robot-use agent (RUA) framework that exposes perception as tools that makes 3D geometry accessible without changing the VLM architecture or training a depth encoder, and suggests that perception-augmented RUAs offer a promising route to sample-efficient, generalizable robotic policies t...

Ze-Xi Li, Ye-Hang Zhang, Wen-Qian Li et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

HINT: Human-Intent Inception for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation

HINT (Human-INTent INcepTion), an agentic framework inspired by the human manipulation principles: semantic intent changes sparsely at manipulation-pattern transitions, whereas continuous control primarily depends on the evolving object-hand relationship.

Ming-Yu Mei, Haojie Xu, Shi-Hao Jin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Bayesian Active Learning for Intent Disambiguation in Interactive Robot Planning

This work proposes a Bayesian framework that treats clarification as an active learning problem over grounded Signal Temporal Logic task specifications and uses LLMs to initialize candidate formal specifications and translate informative contrasts into natural-language clarification questions, while Bayesian optimizati...

Hu-Ao Li, Carson Sobolewski, A. Saravanos et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.