Jul 2026· Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America· Vol 123 28, pp.
e2529943123
· 0 citations· 56 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is demonstrated that defective single-strand break (SSB) repair acts as a potent trigger for genome-wide TE derepression and extensive de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis.
Abstract
Plant genomic and epigenomic integrity are perpetually threatened by exogenous and endogenous DNA damage. However, the interplay between DNA damage, DNA methylation (5mC), and transposable element (TE) activity remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that defective single-strand break (SSB) repair acts as a potent trigger for genome-wide TE derepression and extensive de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Mutations in ZDP/APE2, which encode conserved DNA 3'-end repair enzymes, impair the repair of 3'-blocked SSBs arising from base excision repair, ultimately leading to widespread TE activation. Concurrently, inefficient SSB repair activates the ATR-SOG1-mediated DNA damage response, which enhances the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway to counteract TE activation by depositing 5mC. Paradoxically, the resulting methylation is excised by the DNA demethylase ROS1-a process that itself generates 3'-blocked SSBs requiring resolution by ZDP/APE2. In zdp ape2 mutants, ROS1-mediated 5mC excision produces additional SSBs, which in turn reactivate RdDM. This establishes a self-sustaining SSB-5mC cycle that perpetuates DNA damage and drives massive TE activation in the mutant. Our findings reveal a critical mechanistic link between SSB repair, DNA methylation dynamics, and TE derepression, positioning defective SSB repair as a major inducer of epigenomic instability.
It is demonstrated that the proline-serine-threonine repeat region of Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1) is a multivalent nucleosome-binding domain, sufficient to tether chromatin in multiple contexts, and maintains genome stability during mitosis.
Joshua R. Heyza, Mariia Mikhova, Cody Phillips et al.· Nucleic Acids Research· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that XRCC1 reshapes pol β search behavior to promote efficient local damage recognition, providing a mechanistic basis for how BER factors coordinate lesion detection and processing to maintain genomic stability.
Spencer H. Thompson, Kaitlin M. DeHart, M. Schaich et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The DNA damage response preserves genome integrity by detecting DNA lesions, activating checkpoint signalling, and coordinating repair with cell-cycle control. Defective or incomplete repair can promote mutation accumulation, chromosomal instability, cancer development, and ageing-associated diseases. In this review,...
Armin Sharifi, Amila Suraweera, K. J. O'Byrne et al.· Cellular Oncology· 0 citations
High-resolution structures of three NER intermediates are determined that visualize how TFIIH arrives at sites of DNA damage in an autoinhibited state and how autoinhibition is released via previously undescribed intermediates, contributing to a mechanistic understanding of human DNA repair.
Natàlia de Martín Garrido, Callum A. F. Haste, Junjie Feng et al.· Science Advances· 0 citations
It is reported that DDIAS is a DNA-binding effector of the CIP2A pathway in human cells and proposed that DDIAS defines a mitotic DNA repair system downstream of CIP2A that mitigates the threat of mitotic ssDNA for genome integrity.
Yibo Xue, Faisal Bin Rashed, Daniel Y. L. Mao et al.· Molecules and Cells· 1 citation
DNA double-strand breaks, including those arising from DNA interstrand crosslinks, are highly cytotoxic forms of DNA damage. Their precise repair by homologous recombination (HR) is essential for maintaining genomic stability. During HR, timely disassembly of the core machinery, RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments, is critic...
Tao Zhou, Ming Pang, Xinxin Liang et al.· Proceedings of the National...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.