Skip to content
Review

Stem Cell and Gene Therapies in Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

Aug 2026 · Current Cardiology Reviews · Vol 22 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Stem cell therapies for CHD have demonstrated encouraging biologic signals and generally reassuring early safety data, and the collective findings suggest potential translational applicability of regenerative therapy in the management of congenital heart diseases.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION To systematically evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of stem cell and gene therapies in congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods

The search included PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for human and animal studies published in English from January 2000 through June 2025. Preclinical and clinical studies on stem cell/gene therapy for CHD that reported structural, functional, and safety outcomes were assessed. Due to heterogeneity, data were narratively synthesized.

Results

Of 1, 128 records, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 14 clinical studies, 16 preclinical investigations, and an additional 8 ongoing trials. Most clinical studies focused on single-ventricle physiology, especially HLHS. The interventions demonstrated generally reassuring short-term safety profiles, with none reporting malignant changes or cell-related organ toxicities. Efficacy outcomes were inconsistent, as some trials demonstrated improvements in ventricular function parameters with long-term benefits, whereas others showed no functional improvements despite a favorable safety profile. No definitive clinical trials of gene therapy in CHD have yet been completed.

Discussion

Although the number of clinical trials is limited, the collective findings suggest potential translational applicability of regenerative therapy in the management of congenital heart diseases. The available evidence is limited by small and heterogeneous sample sizes. Future strategies would need to focus on multicenter clinical trials and the application of newer modalities to provide durable responses.

Conclusions

Stem cell therapies for CHD have demonstrated encouraging biologic signals and generally reassuring early safety data. Rigorous multicenter randomized controlled trials with standardized endpoints and long-term follow-up are needed to define their actual therapeutic effectiveness.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Aging Frailty: A Systematic Review

Aging frailty is a multifactorial geriatric syndrome characterized by reduced physiological reserve across multiple interrelated systems, leading to increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential therapeutic intervention due to their immunomodulatory and re...

Eleni Poutouri, Maria Sotiropoulou, M. Potoupnis et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: Bridging Clinical Evidence and Translational Challenges.

This Concise Review synthesizes the current clinical evidence supporting MSC therapy for ischemic stroke, critically examines the biological and translational determinants of therapeutic efficacy, and discusses emerging strategies, including engineered MSCs, extracellular vesicle (EV)-based therapies, and integration w...

Samson Selvaraj · 0 citations
Review Open access Jan 2026

The Reparative Mechanisms Underlying Preclinical Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review

The reparative benefits of NSPC therapy in ischemic stroke are largely attributable to paracrine and immunomodulatory mechanisms, with neuronal replacement playing a minor role.

Joel Karikari Nyarkoh, E. Asiamah, S. B. Nyarko et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Comparative efficacy of stem cell-based therapies versus platelet-rich plasma for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Current evidence does not demonstrate consistent superiority of stem cell-based therapies over PRP for knee OA, but both treatments may improve pain and function, but structural benefit remains unproven.

Febyan Febyan, I. G. M. Aryana, E. Chandra · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Gene therapy for rare diseases marks a new era in precision medicine: Insights from clinical trials

Clinical evidence suggests that gene-based therapies in the management of rare diseases can achieve sustained functional benefits, reduce disease-related complications, and lessen dependence on long-term replacement or supportive treatments.

S. Suprianto, Y. Messe, Raehan AH. Hamzah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Nanoparticle-Based Therapies for Myocardial Injury and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Translational Appraisal of Preclinical Evidence

The field demonstrates substantial formulation diversity and biological activity, but translation is constrained by fragmented characterization, sparse comparative evidence, and incomplete assessment of biological fate and safety.

Ayesha Jabeen, I. Barison, H. Ocagli et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.