Multi-turn RL with Structural and Performance Aware Rewards for CUDA Kernel Generation

DHRCL:Training Code LLMs with Dense Hierarchical Rewards and Curriculum Learning

DHRCL decomposes feedback into syntax validation, execution success, unit-test pass rate, and AST-based structural similarity, and organizes these signals through a three-stage Syntax, Execution, Pass&Structural curriculum, and introduces stage-aware probability-based token credit redistribution.

Performance Foundations of Parallel&Distributed Reasoning Language Models

This work systematize the RL-for-LLM paradigm and provides a compute-centric analysis of prominent post-training algorithmic frameworks: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), as well as their variants, and develops a taxonomy of intra- and inter-model parallelism strategies for RL-for-LLMs.

SFT Augmentation and Replay-Based RL for Countdown Reasoning

RLPF: Reinforcement Learning from Performance Feedback for Code Generation

This work proposes RLPF, reinforcement learning from performance feedback, which turns execution outcomes into a staged reward, and suggests that code agents can be trained not only to pass tests, but also to optimize the programs they write.

Reinforcement Learning for Code Optimization

This work makes execution time learnable through three stages: how code is tested, by building DMC-Optim with large optimization tests and a calibrated sandbox; how speed is turned into reward, by composing correctness and speed in the RL environment and using an offline simulator to predict the most promising configurations.

HARGO: Heterogeneity-Aware Reward-Guided Optimization for RL Post-Training of LLMs on HPC Tasks

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) can equip large language models (LLMs) with domain knowledge for high-performance computing (HPC) tasks such as data race detection and benchmark question answering. However, knowledge alone does not guarantee task-appropriate behavior: the same SFT model that correctly classifies 88.65\% of C/C++ data race samples produces verbose, imprecise answers to factual queries, with 65.9\% of MLPerf responses exceeding 40 characters. Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training addresses this gap by optimizing for task-specific rewards rather than token-level imitation. Yet HPC tasks exhibit extreme heterogeneity, with binary classification, factual QA, and semantic generation differing by 58x in answer length, spanning three distinct reward distributions, and showing widely varying SFT accuracy. This makes uniform-weight RL methods such as GRPO suboptimal. We propose HARGO, Heterogeneity-Aware Reward-Guided Optimization, which introduces per-response importance weighting via confidence-modulated advantage: computing a discrimination signal from group-level reward contrast and a confidence signal from reference model log-probabilities, then modulating the advantage before computing per-response weights, without requiring task-type labels. Across four HPC tasks and nine methods, HARGO achieves the best performance on all three primary metrics: WinRate 54.62\%, Data Race F1 91.30\%, and PLP Similarity 0.8558. Ablation confirms complementary contributions from both signals. HARGO establishes the best overall alignment quality among compared methods for heterogeneous HPC tasks.