Skip to content
Review Open access

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Resistance, and Emerging Opportunities

Aug 2026 · Targeted oncology · Vol 21, pp. 681 - 699 · 0 citations · 154 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Ongoing studies evaluating CDK2 inhibitors, CDK4-selective agents, immunotherapy combinations, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-guided strategies aim to further refine treatment sequencing and improve long-term outcomes in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have significantly changed the treatment approach for hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HER2−) breast cancer in both metastatic and high-risk early-stage settings. In combination with endocrine therapy, these agents consistently improve progression-free survival, and several phase III trials have demonstrated overall survival benefit in defined populations. Their clinical activity is supported by a well-established biologic rationale targeting dysregulated cell cycle progression, a key feature of HR+ breast cancer, which drives tumor proliferation. Despite these advances, resistance remains a clinical limitation in advanced disease. Multiple mechanisms have been identified, including loss of RB1 function; amplification of CDK6, activation of cyclin E CDK2 signaling; upregulation of bypass pathways such as PI3K, AKT, mTOR, and FGFR; and acquired alterations in estrogen receptor signaling, including ESR1 mutations. Circulating tumor DNA assays are increasingly used in clinical practice and clinical trials to detect emerging genomic alterations that may allow earlier modification of therapy based on molecular progression. The post-CDK4/6-inhibitor treatment landscape has expanded substantially and now includes treatment options such as switching CDK4/6 inhibitors, targeting the PI3K–AKT pathway in patients selected for mutation, use of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders, and incorporation of antibody–drug conjugates. Ongoing studies evaluating CDK2 inhibitors, CDK4-selective agents, immunotherapy combinations, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-guided strategies aim to further refine treatment sequencing and improve long-term outcomes in HR+/HER2− breast cancer.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors and the breast cancer immune ecosystem: immune remodeling, resistance, and therapeutic reprogramming

A candidate biomarker-informed framework that integrates tumor-cell escape with cytokine, immune, stromal, vascular, and metabolic remodeling and summarizes emerging therapeutic strategies is proposed, providing a translational basis for testing state-informed and sequence-aware therapeutic strategies.

Yu-Han Tang, Ying-Ze Zhu, Shao-Chun Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Breast Cancer CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance and Immunotherapy Strategies

Two main ways in which CDK4/6 inhibitors exert their effects are reviewed, one is to directly block the cell cycle, and the other is to reshape the immune microenvironment.

Qi-Ya Jing · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Targeted Therapeutics in Breast Cancer: Promise, Progress, and the Challenge of Triple-negative Subtype.

Advances in targeted and immune-based therapies are transforming breast cancer care and Leveraging molecular insights, particularly for TNBC, is crucial to delivering personalised, clinically meaningful treatments and improving outcomes across all subtypes.

S. Sengupta, Ruhi Arisha, Kamal Shah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer in Indonesia: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations.

A review underscores the critical role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of HR+/HER2- ABC, with a particular focus on Indonesian patients, and supports consideration of these agents for inclusion in national clinical guidelines to enhance patient outcomes.

S. S. Panigoro, S. Haryono, P. Prihantono et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.