Skip to content

The Privacy-Hallucination Tradeoff in Differentially Private Language Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 92 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The need for more nuanced privacy-preserving interventions that offer rigorous privacy guarantees without compromising factual accuracy is underscored, as model properties driving this tradeoff are investigated.

Abstract

Both privacy and factual accuracy are paramount in high-stakes domains like healthcare. Concerningly, we uncover and investigate a privacy-hallucination tradeoff in differentially private (DP) language models. First, we empirically show that models pre-trained or fine-tuned with DP tend to produce more hallucinations than non-DP counterparts, with increased severity as the privacy budget grows stricter. Second, we investigate model properties driving this tradeoff, demonstrating that DP mechanisms flatten output distributions, potentially redistributing probability mass toward factually incorrect alternatives. Third, through experiments where we control fact frequency in training data, we characterize how information frequency can reduce hallucination risks in DP models. Overall, our findings underscore the need for more nuanced privacy-preserving interventions that offer rigorous privacy guarantees without compromising factual accuracy.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Alignment Paradox: How Post-Training Amplifies Confident Hallucinations in Language Models

Bounded margins mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training, implemented through an entropy-dependent margin bound in direct preference optimization (DPO) and shown to mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training.

Qing-Jia Huang, Ya-Kai Li, Jian-Guo Wu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

GHOST-Q: Towards Studying Grounding Hallucinations Overlooked Under Same-score TradeOffs in Quantized VLMS

Post-training quantization of vision--language models (VLMs) is typically assessed through aggregate task accuracy and memory savings, but preserving a headline score does not guarantee preservation of visual grounding behavior. We present GHOST-Q, a cross-precision controlled evaluation of three 8B VLM families under...

S. Rehman, Muhammad Shafique · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

How Much Do Legal RAG Systems Still Hallucinate?

A fine-grained analysis of hallucination behavior in eight legal RAG systems across two legal corpora, the GDPR and a national civil law, finds that false-premise questions, containing incorrect assumptions that must be rejected, produce high hallucination rates on the manually-drafted questions.

Souvick Das, S. Abualhaija, D. Bianculli · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

HalluTracer: Hallucination Detection via Depth-Averaging Truth Signals

HalluTracer is introduced, a detection framework that reads and aggregates truthfulness evidence across every layer of the forward pass before the model emits any answer token, recasts hallucination detection from a layer-selection problem into a depth-aggregation problem governed by the geometric sparsity of the truth...

Zhi-Hao Guo, Zong-Han Wu, Huan Huo et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Does Playing it Safe Count as Faithfulness? Reassessing LVLM Hallucination Mitigation Methods

It is argued that hallucination mitigation should be evaluated as a faithfulness--informativeness--capability trade-off rather than through hallucination scores alone, because improvements on hallucination benchmarks do not reliably transfer to broader multimodal capabilities.

Mehrdad Fazli, Sina Mansouri, Mohit Marvania et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.