The need for more nuanced privacy-preserving interventions that offer rigorous privacy guarantees without compromising factual accuracy is underscored, as model properties driving this tradeoff are investigated.
Abstract
Both privacy and factual accuracy are paramount in high-stakes domains like healthcare. Concerningly, we uncover and investigate a privacy-hallucination tradeoff in differentially private (DP) language models. First, we empirically show that models pre-trained or fine-tuned with DP tend to produce more hallucinations than non-DP counterparts, with increased severity as the privacy budget grows stricter. Second, we investigate model properties driving this tradeoff, demonstrating that DP mechanisms flatten output distributions, potentially redistributing probability mass toward factually incorrect alternatives. Third, through experiments where we control fact frequency in training data, we characterize how information frequency can reduce hallucination risks in DP models. Overall, our findings underscore the need for more nuanced privacy-preserving interventions that offer rigorous privacy guarantees without compromising factual accuracy.
Bounded margins mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training, implemented through an entropy-dependent margin bound in direct preference optimization (DPO) and shown to mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training.
Qing-Jia Huang, Ya-Kai Li, Jian-Guo Wu et al.· 0 citations
These findings show that aggregate detection metrics conceal persistent, model dependent heterogeneity in language model failures and motivate regime conditioned evaluation.
Pranav Darshan, A. Pranav, T. SravanKarthick et al.· 0 citations
Post-training quantization of vision--language models (VLMs) is typically assessed through aggregate task accuracy and memory savings, but preserving a headline score does not guarantee preservation of visual grounding behavior. We present GHOST-Q, a cross-precision controlled evaluation of three 8B VLM families under...
A fine-grained analysis of hallucination behavior in eight legal RAG systems across two legal corpora, the GDPR and a national civil law, finds that false-premise questions, containing incorrect assumptions that must be rejected, produce high hallucination rates on the manually-drafted questions.
Souvick Das, S. Abualhaija, D. Bianculli· 0 citations
HalluTracer is introduced, a detection framework that reads and aggregates truthfulness evidence across every layer of the forward pass before the model emits any answer token, recasts hallucination detection from a layer-selection problem into a depth-aggregation problem governed by the geometric sparsity of the truth...
Zhi-Hao Guo, Zong-Han Wu, Huan Huo et al.· 0 citations
It is argued that hallucination mitigation should be evaluated as a faithfulness--informativeness--capability trade-off rather than through hallucination scores alone, because improvements on hallucination benchmarks do not reliably transfer to broader multimodal capabilities.
Mehrdad Fazli, Sina Mansouri, Mohit Marvania et al.· 0 citations