GUI-CC is introduced, a benchmark that evaluates contextual consistency of GUI world models as agent environments rather than isolated next-screen predictors and evaluates transition fidelity, transition plausibility, contextual consistency, and task progress.
Abstract
GUI world models are increasingly evaluated as one-step next-screen predictors, yet their intended use is often as multi-step environments for GUI agents. This mismatch leaves a key requirement under-tested: generated states must remain contextually consistent when they are repeatedly reused for future interaction. We introduce GUI-CC, a benchmark that evaluates contextual consistency of GUI world models as agent environments rather than isolated next-screen predictors. GUI-CC contains two complementary tracks: an offline reference-action track that rolls models along real mobile GUI trajectories, and an online agent-loop track that lets fixed probing agents interact with model-generated UIs. We construct 500 offline trajectory tasks from GUIOdyssey and 200 emulator-verified online tasks across 30 mobile apps. GUI-CC evaluates transition fidelity, transition plausibility, contextual consistency, and task progress. Experiments show that plausible single-step generation does not guarantee reliable environment simulation: current models often produce usable-looking screens while failing to preserve task-relevant context or support executable multi-step rollouts.
KC-Bench is introduced, a controlled multi-turn benchmark for measuring model-level behavior across world-knowledge conflicts, input inconsistencies, and multi-source temporal conflicts, and provides a reproducible diagnostic for developing conflict-aware reasoning and execution safeguards.
Yaxing Lyu, Sheng-Jie Zhou, B. Toh et al.· 2 citations
Understanding where and why Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents fail is essential for building more reliable systems, yet current evaluation relies on step accuracy, a metric that treats each screen independently and overlooks the underlying structure of GUI environments. This leads to two critical blind spots: (1) f...
Shao-Qing Zhang, Ke-Hai Chen, Xue-Feng Bai et al.· 0 citations
The executable harness surrounding a GUI model determines how observations are assembled, actions are executed, and verification, recovery, and termination are controlled. Compared with harness optimization for non-GUI agents, automatically optimizing this harness poses three coupled challenges: reconciling model inten...
Ge-Yi Yang, Zi-Kun Qu, Xiang Li et al.· 0 citations
Realistic environment replicas are increasingly valuable for training and evaluating LLM agents, yet the original systems may be inaccessible or impractical to reproduce. We explore agentic language world modeling: rather than rebuilding an executable environment, a world model agent serves as the environment for a tas...
Quan-Yu Long, Xiao Chen, Jian-Da Chen et al.· 0 citations
AppSim-Bench is proposed, which addresses this trade-off through controllable simulated apps that preserve task-relevant interaction logic while supporting deterministic evaluation and removes major sources of environmental stochasticity, enabling reproducible cross-model comparison.
Jin-Tian Feng, Long Chen, Xiao Yu et al.· 0 citations
This work presents an online skill-evolution framework that converts interaction trajectories and evaluator feedback into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures and characterize evolving skill libraries as auditable, shared procedural memory that can improve a fixed computer-use stack.