Skip to content

RePro: Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting for Reliable Evaluation of LLM Mathematical Problem Solving

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 42 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting (RePro) is proposed, the first framework to integrate Lean-oriented neural automated theorem provers (ATPs) into benchmark rewriting, which rewrites problems and regenerates answers with correctness ensured by Lean-verified proofs.

Abstract

Data contamination undermines the reliable evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on mathematical problem solving. While rewriting-based evaluation mitigates memorization, existing methods lack guarantees of problem validity and answer correctness. We propose Proof-Verified Benchmark Rewriting (RePro), the first framework to integrate Lean-oriented neural automated theorem provers (ATPs) into benchmark rewriting, which rewrites problems and regenerates answers with correctness ensured by Lean-verified proofs. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH show that RePro's retained rewritten instances achieve 100% well-definedness, feasibility, and answer correctness, while existing methods still produce invalid or incorrect instances. Moreover, several models exhibit accuracy drops on proof-verified rewritten benchmarks, suggesting that their performance is sensitive to surface-level and structural variations and may partly reflect memorization effects. Our source code and data are available at https://github.com/AI4Engi/RePro.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond the Answer Key: Robustness Evaluation of Large Language Models for Step-Level Mathematical Verification

Evaluating state-of-the-art open LLMs reveals a significant robustness gap, and shows that reliable process-level verification remains challenging, and evaluator robustness should be measured separately from solver accuracy, even in a simple algebraic domain with exact ground truth.

Fatemeh Mazdarani, Carlos Toxtli · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

SOVER: Formal Certification of Optimization Reformulations via LLM-Assisted SMT Verification

SOVER, an LLM-assisted SMT framework that separates semantic mapping from formal certification, is introduced, and Z3 checks domain cross-feasibility and global objective-order preservation for mixed-integer linear formulations, while dReal provides tolerance-aware feasibility/range and $\epsilon$-argmin checks for con...

Swapnil Bhattacharyya, Mayank Baranwal · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

SWE-Proof: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World Issues with Machine-Checked Proofs?

This work presents Benchproofer, a pipeline that turns a coding task with a known correct patch into a formally verified one, which writes a specification for the new code, summarizes the existing functions that code calls with axioms, and admits an instance only after mechanical and adversarial gates agree.

George Ma, Benjamin Mikek, Hao-Yu Li et al. · 1 citation
Book Open access Oct 2026

Evaluating Symbolic Feedback Granularity for LLM-Based Program Repair

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly incorporated into verifier-in-the-loop software engineering systems, yet it remains unclear how the representation of verifier feedback affects their ability to repair incorrect programs. We study this question by isolating feedback representation from model, task, and prom...

Tao-Er Guo · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Errors to Proofs: Minimal-Core-Guided Repair for Neuro-Symbolic Constraint Solving

On a new benchmark of 77 problems with an exact oracle, translation to Answer Set Programming is faithful on six of seven domains and fails only on aggregate coverage scheduling, which concentrates the translation tax in one diagnosable pattern.

Dipankar Sarkar · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.