Skip to content

DigitalCoach: Communication and Grounding Gaps in Human and Agentic Computer Use Coaching

Jun 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2606.31980 · 0 citations · 55 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

DigitalCoach, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings across five software applications, evaluates whether state-of-the-art models can teach humans how to use computers.

Abstract

Agents are increasingly capable of automating software tasks, but can they teach humans how to use software themselves? We introduce DigitalCoach, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings across five software applications. We use DigitalCoach to evaluate whether state-of-the-art models can teach humans how to use computers. Automated evaluation shows that models differ from humans in how they coach: models provide more direct instructions, but fewer explanations, error diagnoses, and knowledge-check questions. When we fix the coaching method, models produce utterances similar to human references yet poorly grounded in visual context. Interactive evaluation confirms that model coaches cause learners to passively follow instructions without deeper engagement and fall short in visual grounding. DigitalCoach lays a foundation for collaborative and proactive computer use coaching agents. Data and code are available at https://project-digital-coach.vercel.app.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Sep 2026

Towards a virtual human improv troupe for social skills training

The Virtual Human Improv Library is presented, a multi-agent framework for social skill training through improvised interpersonal role-play, in which users interact with virtual characters in real time.

B. Dincer, Sofia Hirschmann, Stacy Marsella · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond"ChatGPT Can Make Mistakes": Designing Interventions to Support Metacognitive Monitoring in AI-Assisted Work

A shared vocabulary, a design space, and evidence that measured monitoring and task performance are separable design targets are contributed, suggesting that measured monitoring and task performance are separable design targets.

M. A. D. Santos, P. Thiesse, Steeven Villa et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Holographic conversational agents for education

Conversational agents in universities are mostly screen-based and lack the presence needed for confident, back-and-forth teaching. We introduce life-sized, AI-powered Holographic Conversational Agents (HCAs) that run on Proto displays and portray Ada Lovelace and Averroes for use in education and public engagement. T...

Ronnie Gohel, S. Saravi, Yan-Ning Yang et al. · 1 citation
#large language models Open access Sep 2026

Scaffolding students-AI dialogue for safe educational interactions

The Steered Contextual AI Framework for Orchestrating Learning Dialogue (SCAFFOLD), a layered reliability architecture that surrounds LLM-generated text and speech with external verification, targeted repair, and safe fallback, while preserving data privacy, is proposed.

Olga Muss, L. M. Leisten, Charles Edouard Bardyn · 0 citations

Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans

It is suggested that chatbot communication style influences users’ perceptions of conversational agents and may improve performance relative to less supportive chatbot designs, but the overall value of chatbot interaction depends on the task context.

Erik Derner, Dalibor Kučera, Aditya Gulati et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.