Group Adaptive Clipping Policy Optimization (GAPO), a plug-in modification to GRPO methods that adapts the clipping boundary to the rollout advantage, is proposed, motivated by a reverse-KL trust-region perspective, which suggests that rollouts with larger learning signal should receive proportionally greater update headroom.
Abstract
Group relative policy optimization for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) typically uses a fixed importance-sampling (IS) ratio clipping boundary across all rollouts. We identify a key limitation: rare correct rollouts on harder problems and abundant correct rollouts on easier problems are clipped at comparable rates, despite contributing very different learning signals. Rollouts with low group success exhibit larger IS ratios and carry stronger gradient signal for exploration and solving new problems, yet are disproportionately suppressed by fixed clipping. To address this, we propose Group Adaptive Clipping Policy Optimization (GAPO), a plug-in modification to GRPO methods that adapts the clipping boundary to the rollout advantage. GAPO is motivated by a reverse-KL trust-region perspective, which suggests that rollouts with larger learning signal should receive proportionally greater update headroom. GAPO requires no reward shaping and preserves the standard PPO/GSPO surrogate while adapting only the clipping threshold. Across Qwen and Llama models, GAPO consistently improves both Pass@1 and Pass@k over fixed clipping and advantage-shaping baselines on math reasoning and coding benchmarks where the pass rates by the base model are relatively low.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a cornerstone for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but the need for on-policy data substantially limits training efficiency. Reusing off-policy data through importance sampling (IS) can improve efficiency but introduce considerable instability....
This work proposes FastRL, a novel plug-and-play reinforcement learning framework that simultaneously improves training efficiency and the effectiveness of policy learning, and introduces an advantage-aware pruning strategy to selectively preserve high-advantage trajectories while maximizing inter-trajectory gradient d...
Jia-Hua Yang, Zhiwei Yang, Xian-Peng Zhang et al.· 0 citations
A key strength of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is its learned critic, which uses historical trajectories collected during reinforcement learning to estimate expected returns and reduce policy-gradient variance. However, we find that the critic is also a major source of instability in reinforcement learning for la...
Xuan-Yi Zhou, Qiu-Yang Mang, Huan-Zhi Mao et al.· 0 citations
The prior requires no target-policy rollout before the first selection, but the posterior thereafter uses target-policy outcomes, and the measured ThinkPrior+DAPO composition reduces generated rollouts by 10.6% while both arms retain the same 3840-rollout update budget.
Tommy Sha, Skylar Zhai, Si-Qi Zhao· 1 citation· ⚡1
This work proposes two complementary strategies to improve the performance of value function RL: Privileged Value Functions (PVF) which provide an elegant mechanism to inject additional task-relevant token-level signal without biasing the policy objective; and TETHER, a baseline that adaptively interpolates between gro...
S. Venkatraman, Matthieu Dinot, Laurence Aitchison· 1 citation· ⚡1
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) methods such as GRPO rely on successful self-generated trajectories, but finite rollout budgets can produce all-fail groups with no reward-based policy-gradient signal. While additional rollouts improve the chance of success at higher cost, successful trajectories m...
Doohyuk Jang, Y. Park, Gyouk Chu et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 27, 2026
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.