Skip to content

AdaptNTK: Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification and Active Learning for Neural Network Potentials

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 43 references
Computer Science Physics

TL;DR

AdaptNTK is introduced, a single-model framework that measures uncertainty as a regularized Mahalanobis distance in empirical neural tangent kernel (NTK) feature space, providing efficient single-model uncertainty estimation with sequential updates for data-efficient active learning.

Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials bridge the gap between quantum chemical precision and classical computational speed, enabling molecular dynamics simulations with first-principles accuracy. Their reliability is often improved through active learning, which iteratively expands the training set by identifying uncertain, out-of-distribution configurations. Existing uncertainty-quantification methods often involve a trade-off between computational cost and reliability, and generally cannot account for redundancy as an acquisition batch is assembled. Here, we introduce AdaptNTK, a single-model framework that measures uncertainty as a regularized Mahalanobis distance in empirical neural tangent kernel (NTK) feature space. With the NTK features fixed during acquisition, the uncertainty depends on the acquired configurations but not their reference labels. This allows the uncertainty to be updated recursively after each selection without retraining, reducing redundancy within an acquisition batch. On held-out rMD17 data, AdaptNTK achieves the highest mean correlations with force errors (Spearman 0.68, Pearson 0.71) and matches a three-member ensemble in error retention. In active learning experiments, AdaptNTK achieves the lowest force errors across rMD17 and Transition-1X, with particularly strong performance on transition-state configurations in Transition-1X. AdaptNTK provides a 2.6-fold speedup per Transition-1X cycle relative to the ensemble, providing efficient single-model uncertainty estimation with sequential updates for data-efficient active learning.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Improving Reliability of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials with Physics-Informed Pretraining

This work presents a physics-informed pretraining strategy that leverages simple empirical potentials to improve the robustness and stability of MLIPs for MD simulations and demonstrates that this physics-informed pretraining consistently improves both prediction accuracy as well as stability in MD.

Qian-Yu Zheng, Victor Fung · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Symbolic ensemble learning enables discovery of fast accurate physics-based interatomic potentials

A hybrid symbolic-neural framework is introduced that unifies the interpretability of the Embedded Atom Method with the adaptability of data-driven learning, and derives a composite potential that surpasses the fidelity of its constituent models.

Bilvin Varughese, Aditya Koneru, Adil Muhammad et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Δ-learning for transferable machine learning interatomic potentials.

Machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) trained by directly learning the total interatomic interaction energies can suffer from limited transferability, unphysical behavior beyond a finite cutoff, and large errors for out-of-distribution geometries such as transition states and uncommon conformers. We evaluate...

T. T. Nguyen, Christopher N. Rowley · 1 citation
Aug 2026

ALF: Open-Source Active Learning Framework for Atomistic Modeling.

The Active Learning Framework (ALF), an open-source Python package designed to streamline the design and deployment of MLIP training datasets on High Performance Computing resources, is introduced, illustrating ALF’s effectiveness in compiling datasets that capture essential chemical and structural regimes.

V. Grizzi, P. Lohr, Nikita Fedik et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Data-Efficient Construction of Material-Specific Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Trajectories

Pretrained machine-learning interatomic potentials, so-called universal or foundation models offer an appealing starting point for atomistic simulations, but their accuracy for material-specific observables often remains limited without additional reference data (fine-tuning). Here, we systematically quantify how much...

Jonas Hänseroth, Christian Dreßler · 2 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.