Adaptive Multi-Reward Projection is proposed, a lightweight online method that reallocates aggregation weights using three signals, relative shortfall, reward volatility, and recent progress, increasing pressure on lagging, unstable, or stagnant dimensions while relieving saturated ones.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning fine-tuning of large language models increasingly adopts multiple reward dimensions, including verifiable rules, task-specific evaluators, and learned reward models, to provide richer supervision across diverse capabilities. These dimensions are commonly scalarized with fixed aggregation weights. We identify a failure mode in which aggregation itself induces reward hacking: static projection aliases qualitatively different reward profiles into a single scalar, steering optimization toward whichever dimensions are easiest, densest, or systematically favored by the reward signal. Over training, this traps the policy in suboptimal profiles and prevents convergence to better-balanced ones that would yield higher task performance. To address this, we propose Adaptive Multi-Reward Projection (AMRP), a lightweight online method that reallocates aggregation weights using three signals, relative shortfall, reward volatility, and recent progress, increasing pressure on lagging, unstable, or stagnant dimensions while relieving saturated ones. Across structured reasoning, citation-grounded generation, and open-ended alignment under GRPO, AMRP consistently improves reward-profile balance and downstream performance over fixed and dynamic weighting baselines; it also remains effective with GDPO and PPO, supporting compatibility across RL algorithms. Our code is available at https://github.com/yyhappier/AMRP.git.
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a powerful technique for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preference. However, it often suffers from the reward hacking issue, where policy optimization improves the proxy reward model while actually degrading performance with respect to the true huma...
Jia-Bin Fan, De-Zhi Ye, Yong-Chang Hao et al.· 0 citations
Large language models can intervene in reinforcement learning through both reward design and action selection, yet aggregate performance offers an incomplete account of what these interventions actually do. Similar returns can conceal different learning mechanisms, while plausible rewards can induce undesirable behavio...
Cheng-Yu Luan, Bo Xin, Song-Yan Guo et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based post-training has become a key mechanism for improving reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs), especially when automated verifiers enable Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR). Recent methods, however, are increasingly modular: many apparent algorithmic advances recombin...
Liu Yang, Han Zhu, Zheng-Yang Zhong et al.· International Conference on...· 2 citations
Multi-reward reinforcement learning trains large language models to satisfy multiple behavioral objectives simultaneously. Reward-wise normalization, as used in GDPO, preserves reward-specific relative information within rollout groups, but different objectives can still exhibit uneven learning progress. We study this...
Tong Zheng, Skylar Zhai, Zhan Cheng et al.· 0 citations
EvoRS is introduced, a self-evolving RL framework that evolves the reward system from on-policy experience, representing it as an executable Reward-DAG, and is updated from on-policy rollouts and reward traces to maintain train-time reliability.
Wei-Yuan Li, Ai-Li Chen, Xin-Tao Wang et al.· 1 citation
Reward hacking during reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) can induce reward seeking and broad misalignment in language models. Studying this misgeneralization is important for developing better threat models and countermeasures, but is often infeasible due to the cost of RL on large models. As an alte...
Oliver Daniels, Perusha Moodley, Benjamin M. Marlin et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 15, 2026
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026