This work investigates the fundamental design principles required for robust visual text representation learning and trains Pixel Linguist II, a native-resolution vision encoder trained with on-the-fly rendering, unified contrastive grounding, and a multilingual curriculum over 280M training examples.
Abstract
Text-rich visual inputs require models that can read, retrieve, and compress language directly in pixel space, yet existing pixel-text encoders struggle with fixed resolution pretraining, visual shortcut learning, weak visual grounding, and multilingual visual text understanding. In this work, we investigate the fundamental design principles required for robust visual text representation learning. Through systematic controlled ablations, we identify four critical components: variable image resolutions and rendered font sizes provide spatial proxies for high-resolution document generalization; natural image-text pairs are indispensable for grounding and prevent text-only collapse; layout-aware rendering helps prevent pixel-level shortcuts; and a two-stage multilingual curriculum enables effective cross-lingual alignment. By integrating these principles into a scalable training recipe, we train Pixel Linguist II, a native-resolution vision encoder trained with on-the-fly rendering, unified contrastive grounding, and a multilingual curriculum over 280M training examples. Pixel Linguist II sets new state-of-the-art results on English, cross-lingual, and multilingual Visual STS and ViDoRe, while also enabling better MLLM downstream evaluation. Notably, Pixel Linguist II remains robust under 80\% visual token compression, showing great promise for optical context compression. Our code and resources are available at https://github.com/Pixel-Linguist/Pixel-Linguist-II.
FocusVTC, which combines compressed low-DPI global views with selective region enhancement, integrating enhanced views into ongoing reasoning, is introduced, which breaks this trade-off through adaptive resolution while preserving general multimodal capabilities.
Fang-Zhi Zhong, Xue-Rui Qiu, Yu-Qi Pan et al.· 0 citations
Instruction Distillation is proposed: an offline procedure in which the MLLM itself generates, for each individual training image, a structured identification instruction encoding general appearance cues, features that differentiate the class from visually similar ones, and a common confusion point.
Hardik Jindal, Soumyabrata Pal, Sayak Ray Chowdhury· 0 citations
SEER is presented, a framework that learns to select query-relevant images through visual scanning and retrieve textual content only where needed, combining the efficiency of visual compression with the precision of text-based reasoning.
Jiawei Xu, Zhilin Zhai, Jinrui Fang et al.· 3 citations
It is found that applying textual guidance too early can limit its ability to identify answer-relevant visual regions, whereas text-to-visual attention becomes more informative at intermediate decoder depths.
Min-Chan Kang, Kyeonghye Park, Seoyoung Cho et al.· 0 citations
Scene Text Retrieval (STR) aims to search images containing a given textual query within large-scale image collections. However, existing approaches are fundamentally constrained in two ways: 1) they are evaluated on narrow benchmarks that focus primarily on natural scenes; and 2) they rely on either error-prone multi-...
Tong-Kun Guan, Yu-Tong Cai, Hao-Cheng Wang et al.· IEEE Transactions on Image P...· 0 citations
Recent text-to-image diffusion systems have begun replacing CLIP and T5 text encoders with decoder-only large language models (LLMs), motivated by their stronger language understanding. This substitution, however, does not straightforwardly improve image-text alignment: naively using an LLM as the prompt encoder can su...
Yogesh Kakde, Jitendra Jaiswal, B. Sahoo et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.