This work shows how to find this valence axis (V-axis) from just 9 emotion category names plus 50 short narrative paragraphs per emotion -- about 1,500 fewer labels than the usual supervised approach -- and that the same direction appears in vision, audio, and human-brain encoders never jointly trained.
Abstract
Inside a modern language model sits a single internal direction that tracks how positive or negative a sentence feels. We show how to find this valence axis (V-axis) from just 9 emotion category names plus 50 short narrative paragraphs per emotion -- about 1,500 fewer labels than the usual supervised approach -- and that the same direction appears in vision, audio, and human-brain encoders never jointly trained. The recipe: embed nine emotion-anchored story sets in a frozen encoder, take the top principal direction of the nine averaged embeddings. Projecting new inputs onto it captures 93% of supervised performance on SST-2 (Llama-3-8B-Instruct, AUC 0.772 vs. 0.828), correlates with human valence ratings on 11,811 EmoSet images at r=0.636, reaches AUC 0.906 on ESC-50 audio (p<2.2e-15), and AUC 0.720+/-0.055 on EEG from 123 subjects (p<3.65e-8). The direction is mechanistically active: ablating it collapses sentiment accuracy by 5.5-37.2 pp across three LLMs vs. at most 0.88 pp for matched random directions (z>12). A 2-parameter classifier trained on text labels transfers to images (AUC 0.961), audio (0.764), and brain recordings (0.828) without target-modality labels; a generic 16-D subspace stays at chance (0.525). The recipe is bounded to continuous attributes -- seven tests on categorical concepts return near-chance -- and steering is family-specific (Llama/Mistral yes, Qwen/Gemma no).
Large language models trained and aligned within different linguistic and regional ecosystems may frame the same political, cultural, and geopolitical entities in different ways. Such differences are often evaluated through sentiment, favorability, or stance, reducing model attitudes to a single positive-negative axis. We introduce REGARD, a study of what drives affective framing differences across LLMs on post-Soviet entities using target-directed Valence-Arousal-Dominance profiling. We query 19 models on 500 region-specific targets, score their responses with two independent LLM judges, GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, and validate the measurements on a 300-item human-annotated subset. Post-hoc Ward-linkage clustering of all 19 models by affective and response-behavior profiles yields three behavioral clusters that cut across model origin, family, and parameter count. Generic-answer rate is strongly associated with lower arousal (r = -0.81) and with cluster placement: models that deflect evaluative prompts with templated responses cluster together at low arousal regardless of origin. These findings show that VAD profiling captures emotional intensity, a dimension of affective framing that is largely invisible to conventional sentiment-based evaluation.
A. Chetvergov, Alexander Evseev, Mikhail Solovev et al.· 0 citations
Large language models routinely describe socially salient targets, including political figures, countries, religions, organizations, historical events, and social groups, encoding affective framing alongside factual content: a target may appear favorable or threatening, calm or conflictual, powerful or vulnerable. Existing work captures parts of this space through sentiment, favorability, and emotion benchmarks, but none combines target-directed VAD attribution, an explicit scorer contract, and a passport reporting format. We introduce VIBE, a benchmark for entity-centered affective profiling of LLM outputs in Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) space. Its core contribution is a measurement contract: VIBE separates generation from external scoring, distinguishes scalar favorability, response-level VAD, and target-directed VAD, and reports profiles through an Affective Passport. Three empirical layers support the contract. H1 shows scalar favorability does not subsume arousal and dominance: valence findings are cross-validated (rV = 0.944 judge-human, rV = 0.954 inter-scorer); arousal and dominance are single-scorer directional estimates, not point-precise, consistent with known inter-annotator difficulty on these axes (rA = 0.495, rD = 0.702 among human annotators). H2 shows whole-response and target-directed VAD are different contracts: the same text can carry one affective tone overall while representing the named target differently. H3 is a protocol-drift diagnostic: elicitation conditions shift profiles, motivating context metadata in every affective report. These results motivate entity-centered affective profiling as a documented practice: profiles should be released with scorer identity, coverage, protocol, and interpretation limits.
A. Chetvergov, Alexander Evseev, Timofei Sivoraksha et al.· 0 citations
Understanding human emotions in spoken conversations is a key challenge in affective computing, with applications in empathetic AI, human computer interaction, and mental health monitoring. However, existing datasets vary in scale, emotion distribution, modality alignment, and data partitioning strategies, which can influence reliable cross-dataset generalization and minority-emotion modeling. We introduce SpEmoC a Speaking segment Emotion for Conversations comprising 306,544 raw clips from 3,100 English language movies and TV series. From these, 30,000 high quality, class balanced clips are curated, featuring synchronized visual, audio, and textual modalities annotated for seven emotions through a hybrid pipeline that integrates pretrained models with human validation. SpEmoC uses strict movie- and series-level splits to prevent content overlap between split sets, allowing more reliable evaluation of model generalization. The dataset also maintains a near-balanced distribution across seven emotions, including minority classes such as Fear and Disgust, which supports more balanced learning across categories. Extensive experiments, including in-domain benchmarking, cross-dataset transfer, low-data training, class-imbalance analysis, and modality transfer show that balanced data and careful splitting lead to more stable performance across emotions when models are evaluated on other datasets. These results highlight the importance of dataset design for robust and transferable multimodal emotion recognition.
Preference over model-generated emotion descriptions is emerging as a standard evaluation metric for multimodal emotion understanding, exemplified by the MER2026 MER-Prefer track on EmoPrefer. Such benchmarks assume that predicting the preferred description requires grounded cross-modal understanding of the video. We conduct a systematic shortcut audit of EmoPrefer using content-blind probes. A simple logistic regression using only description length and generator identity, without processing the text, video, or audio, performs comparably to LoRA-finetuned 7B text and audio-visual judges (65.8 versus 66.8 WAF on EmoPrefer-V2). Generator identity is recoverable from description text with 99.5 percent accuracy, every candidate pair contrasts two distinct generators, and the human preference labels agree with a fold-exclusive per-generator win-rate prior on 66 percent of the evaluated pairs. When the human label conflicts with this prior, trained judges still follow the style prior on 63 to 80 percent of the pairs. On a length-matched subset that neutralizes verbosity bias, the tested media configurations yield no statistically significant improvement, while an ODIN-inspired diagnostic that decouples the style shortcut leaves its content head near chance. These results do not imply that human preferences are inherently stylistic or that the descriptions contain no emotional information. Instead, they show that the current scores can be reached without verifying either description against the video. We recommend source-balanced pairing, strict length control, counter-stereotypical sliced reporting, and multi-annotator consensus for future cross-generator evaluations. Code is available at https://github.com/jiabingyang01/EmoPrefer-Audit.
Jiabing Yang, Yixiang Chen, Yuan Xu et al.· 0 citations
Inferring the collective emotional state of a group of people from a single image, a task known as group emotion recognition (GER), requires integrating spatially distributed cues such as faces, poses, interactions, and scene context. Current methods rely on detector-driven multi-stream pipelines. These are trained with only image-level supervision that lacks guidance on which regions matter or how strongly each contributes. We propose LG-GER, a language-guided distillation framework that uses a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to generate dense, spatially grounded evidence, i.e., bounding boxes paired with emotion signals and confidence scores, for the training images. This structured evidence is distilled into a single vision-language model (VLM) backbone through four complementary losses: classification, region-text grounding, spatial emotion, and spatial confidence regression. At inference, LG-GER requires no detectors, no MLLM, and no multi-stream fusion, making GER practical for real-time and resource-constrained deployment. LG-GER has been evaluated on two benchmark GER datasets (GroupEmoW and GAF~3.0) and achieves competitive or superior results compared to state-of-the-art methods that require detection and multi-stream processing at inference.
Ahmed-Shehab Khan, Zhiyuan Li, Yan Tong· 0 citations
People who write about depression on social media often convey several emotions that shift within a single post, yet most datasets flatten these dynamics into one post-level label. To enable sentence-level study, we present DepressionEmo-SL, a corpus of Reddit posts in which each sentence is annotated with one of nine emotions: anger, cognitive dysfunction, emptiness, hopelessness, loneliness, sadness, suicide intent, worthlessness, or no emotion. We propose a four-level context protocol (C0-C3) that provides models with progressively larger windows of surrounding text to assess the impact of narrative context on classification. We evaluate five Transformer encoders, including MentalBERT and MentalRoBERTa, under each context setting. Results show that wider narrative context consistently improves performance and that ensembling across context levels provides further improvements. However, these improvements are not uniform across categories, with some emotions benefiting more from additional context than others. Overall, our findings show that context is an important factor in sentence-level depression emotion analysis, while also highlighting the challenges that remain for reliable category-level classification.
Saman Sarker Joy, Tanusree Das Aishi, Shuchismita Anwar et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
