It is shown how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via decomposition of a subjective risk, based on a strictly proper loss, and considered a first step towards a full learning-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification.
Abstract
We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification. Uncertainty measures are not primitives, in need of axioms and argumentation, but instead consequences, of higher-level modelling decisions. We show how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via decomposition of a subjective risk, based on a strictly proper loss. Reverse cross entropy provides a prominent example, where decomposition recovers the classic information-theoretic uncertainty terms. The same approach recovers numerous measures previously proposed across the UQ literature, providing them a common theoretical foundation. This suggests a new approach to UQ: given a modelling scenario and strictly proper loss, the corresponding epistemic and aleatoric terms are induced by the subjective-risk decomposition. We then extend our view to learning theory: we introduce and analyse subjective risk analogues of excess risk, approximation error and estimation error, and identify the connections to UQ. We consider this a first step towards a full learning-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification.
Uncertainty estimation in machine learning typically decomposes uncertainty into aleatoric uncertainty (AU) and epistemic uncertainty (EU) using the standard information-theoretic framework. However, in practice, two critical issues arise: entanglement (AU and EU are highly correlated) and epistemic collapse (EU magnit...
Jakob L. Christensen, Christian F. Baumgartner, M. Hannemose et al.· 0 citations
Reliable uncertainty estimates are critical in safety-sensitive applications. For such estimates to be useful in practice, it is crucial to understand the sources underlying a model's uncertainty, motivating the disentanglement of total uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Existing notions of uncertain...
Frieder Wizgall, Georg Tirpitz, Moritz Seiler et al.· 2 citations
The B-EUR model provides a computational account of candidate-action evaluation within uncertainty-driven design activity and offers implications for constructing prototype sets, framing design problems, and organizing feedback to support informative exploration.
Shimon Honda, Takuma Miyaguchi, Koji Koizumi et al.· 0 citations
RATTL targets runtime safety for agents, including LLM-based systems, acting under uncertainty, and proves a Safety Sandwich: the RATTL value lies between the uninformed robust value and the full- knowledge optimum, with a gap that vanishes as the posterior concentrates.
The new modeling paradigm subsumes several classical SOC/MDP formulations, including risk-averse and distributionally robust SOC/MDPs as well as partially observed and Bayes-adaptive MDPs, and generates so-called preference robust SOC/MDP models.
An agent still learning its environment should be cautious while ignorant and bold once confident. The entropic value-at-risk captures this through a robust-optimization identity---a confidence level fixes the radius of a relative-entropy ball of alternative models---but that ball cannot reach catastrophes the nominal...
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.