Skip to content

Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.15196 · 1 citation · ⚡ 1 influential · 51 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

It is shown how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via decomposition of a subjective risk, based on a strictly proper loss, and considered a first step towards a full learning-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification.

Abstract

We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification. Uncertainty measures are not primitives, in need of axioms and argumentation, but instead consequences, of higher-level modelling decisions. We show how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via decomposition of a subjective risk, based on a strictly proper loss. Reverse cross entropy provides a prominent example, where decomposition recovers the classic information-theoretic uncertainty terms. The same approach recovers numerous measures previously proposed across the UQ literature, providing them a common theoretical foundation. This suggests a new approach to UQ: given a modelling scenario and strictly proper loss, the corresponding epistemic and aleatoric terms are induced by the subjective-risk decomposition. We then extend our view to learning theory: we introduce and analyse subjective risk analogues of excess risk, approximation error and estimation error, and identify the connections to UQ. We consider this a first step towards a full learning-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Structural Limits of the Information-Theoretic Uncertainty Decomposition

Uncertainty estimation in machine learning typically decomposes uncertainty into aleatoric uncertainty (AU) and epistemic uncertainty (EU) using the standard information-theoretic framework. However, in practice, two critical issues arise: entanglement (AU and EU are highly correlated) and epistemic collapse (EU magnit...

Jakob L. Christensen, Christian F. Baumgartner, M. Hannemose et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Risk

Reliable uncertainty estimates are critical in safety-sensitive applications. For such estimates to be useful in practice, it is crucial to understand the sources underlying a model's uncertainty, motivating the disentanglement of total uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Existing notions of uncertain...

Frieder Wizgall, Georg Tirpitz, Moritz Seiler et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) Model: A Computational Account of What Makes Design Options Worth Trying

The B-EUR model provides a computational account of candidate-action evaluation within uncertainty-driven design activity and offers implications for constructing prototype sets, framing design problems, and organizing feedback to support informative exploration.

Shimon Honda, Takuma Miyaguchi, Koji Koizumi et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Quantifying Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: Belief-Dependent Robustness for Safe Sequential Decision Making

RATTL targets runtime safety for agents, including LLM-based systems, acting under uncertainty, and proves a Safety Sandwich: the RATTL value lies between the uninformed robust value and the full- knowledge optimum, with a gap that vanishes as the posterior concentrates.

D. Ganguly, Jan Křetinský · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Bayesian composite risk approach for stochastic optimal control and Markov decision processes

The new modeling paradigm subsumes several classical SOC/MDP formulations, including risk-averse and distributionally robust SOC/MDPs as well as partially observed and Bayes-adaptive MDPs, and generates so-called preference robust SOC/MDP models.

Wen-Tao Ma, Zhi-Ping Chen, Huifu Xu · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Robust Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: A Wasserstein Counterpart of the Entropic Value-at-Risk

An agent still learning its environment should be cautious while ignorant and bold once confident. The entropic value-at-risk captures this through a robust-optimization identity---a confidence level fixes the radius of a relative-entropy ball of alternative models---but that ball cannot reach catastrophes the nominal...

D. Ganguly, Jan Křetinský · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.