Unified On-Policy Self-Distillation (USD), a lightweight online algorithm to solve the Lagrangian, reveals that a single dual variable governs both decisions: at one price for learning difficulty, it simultaneously sets the token-selection threshold and the direction of privileged-information adjustment, keeping supervision matched to the student's evolving capacity.
Abstract
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) improves the reasoning abilities of LLMs by internalizing privileged context into model parameters through self-distillation. Two recent research lines promote vanilla OPSD by choosing which tokens to learn from and by controlling how much privileged information the teacher receives, respectively. However, we show that each line optimizes one variable while holding the other fixed, which leads to a suboptimal solution. We argue that the two variables are coupled through the student's learning capacity: the privileged information sets the per-token divergence the teacher prescribes, while token weighting selects which of these the student must absorb. We formalize the two lines of work into a unified optimization framework, which maximizes the aggregate teacher--student divergence, subject to a budget on the aggregate learning difficulty the student can absorb. Under this modelling, we propose Unified On-Policy Self-Distillation (USD), a lightweight online algorithm to solve the Lagrangian. USD reveals that a single dual variable governs both decisions: at one price for learning difficulty, it simultaneously sets the token-selection threshold and the direction of privileged-information adjustment, keeping supervision matched to the student's evolving capacity. Through extensive experiments, USD consistently demonstrates superior performance over OPSD and token- and PI-side baselines across various model scales on various reasoning benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/lauvlalala/USD.
Self-OPD is introduced, a teacher-free OPD framework for flow matching models that turns the student's own self-exploration into step-wise supervision and outperforms prior RL and OPD methods without task-specific teachers.
Shi-Yi Zhang, Mu-Shui Liu, Yunze Tong et al.· 1 citation
This review treats collapse as a symptom governed by three levers: where the signal is applied, that is, how tokens are weighted; what the teacher is shown, that is, the nature of the privileged information; and when the signal changes, that is, the teacher's dynamics and the decay of guidance.
It is found that stronger alignment attributable to the correct reference does not reliably coincide with a greater performance benefit from the reference, and performance gains and distributional alignment alone cannot determine how privileged reference information contributes to student learning in OPSD.
DualOPSD, an asymmetric alternating framework that adapts both policies, reduces truncation across all three scales, and makes later supervision responsive to the learner and does not require another rollout.
This work introduces Latent On-Policy Self-Distillation (LOPD), which, rather than proposing another hand-crafted OPSD variant with a newly prescribed form of privileged context, makes the teacher's privileged context itself learnable end-to-end from experience.
Gui-Min Zhang, Jiayang Lyu, Ran Sun et al.· 6 citations
Experiments spanning mathematical reasoning, multi-domain STEM, code generation, and multi-turn agentic tasks show that RISE outperforms RLVR-only training and on-policy self-distillation across all settings.
Yang Li, Semih Yavuz, Shafiq Joty· 5 citations· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.