Skip to content
Preprint

Belief-Space Perception Routing under Coupled Sensor Faults and Compute Contention

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 12 references
Computer Science Engineering

TL;DR

This work presents a perception router that tracks probabilistic estimates of sensor-fault state and compute- contention state, couples them with a noisy-OR term, and uses the coupled estimate to pick one of four detector configurations so that the frame finishes before its deadline.

Abstract

A robot that has to see and react on a fixed clock runs into two problems at once. Its cameras degrade in rain, mud, fog, and darkness. And the single onboard processor it runs on is shared with planning and control, so the compute left over for perception moves around from second to second. Most systems model the two separately. We present a perception router that tracks probabilistic estimates of sensor-fault state and compute- contention state, couples them with a noisy-OR term, and uses the coupled estimate to pick one of four detector configurations (YOLO11x/n at 1280 or 640 px) so that the frame finishes before its deadline. Where the two stressors co-occur, the coupled policy cuts the deadline-miss rate by 1.1 to 9.4 percentage points against a policy that treats them independently. The interval excludes zero in five of six conditions, the pooled effect over 10 sequences and 6 conditions has sign-test p = 0.001, and every uncoupled control and the fault-free trajectory sit at exactly 0.0 pp. Routing costs tens of microseconds per frame. We then asked whether the coupling the method exploits arises on its own. Across eight real RADIATE adverse-weather sequences and three workload proxies independent of the fault signal, after Benjamini-Hochberg correction and a replication run, none of 24 tests found it. We report that null and scope the routing result as a proof of mechanism. Whether such coupling occurs in the field is still open, and the released evaluation pipeline lets a deployment settle it on its own traces.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

LIBERO-MAX: Do Robot Policies Adapt When the World Changes?

Robots must often continue a task after a target moves, the viewpoint shifts, or an obstacle appears, even though their earlier observations and committed actions reflect the previous scene. Many simulation robustness benchmarks fix external conditions at reset, leaving this temporal challenge underexamined. We introdu...

Yun-Bei Zhang, Zi-Jian Jin, Yuan-Zhe Liu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Quanta Perception as Probabilistic Events

By replacing frame reconstruction with direct probabilistic inference over photon streams, this work bridges photon-counting quanta sensing with robotic vision and bridges photon-counting quanta sensing with robotic vision.

Varun Sundar, Pavan Thodima, Sacha Jungerman et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

PIER: An Evidence-Gated Execution Interface for Robotic Manipulation

Generating a plausible robot action does not establish that current observations justify its execution. Motivated by exploratory observations of high-confidence visual outputs under severe occlusion, we present PIER, an execution-authorization interface that separates evidence checks, decision provenance, and stage-sco...

Zoe Li, A. Wang, Zhong-Yu Chen et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

World Models Under Asynchronous Sensor Observations

The findings show that the effectiveness of time-to-refresh depends on the causal role of the sampling schedule, specifically when refresh events affect the system rather than merely report its state.

Akash Anand, Abhay Anand, Yash Vishe · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents

We study whether small LLM agents can operate effectively under explicit wall-clock time budgets by both respecting the allocated runtime and using available time productively. We evaluate Qwen3.6-27B on five competitions from MLE-Bench Lite and Qwen3-4B on Zork I (Jericho), two agentic benchmarks where additional comp...

Aaron Wang, Neelabh Madan, Vlad Sobal et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Shared Execution-Clock Drifting Policy for Dynamic Precision Manipulation

Manipulation under time constraints requires both accurate actions and an execution rhythm that matches the evolving scene. This becomes critical when a robot must intercept moving objects or complete a sequence of adjustments before a deadline. Although one-step policies reduce generation cost, their directly predicte...

Zhen Dong, Qing-Ran Wu, Jin-Na Fu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.