Skip to content

Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov

Sep 2026 · 6 citations · 32 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

The anytime lower bound shows that the rate of non-anytime silver schedules (Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025; Grimmer et al., 2025) is unattainable in the anytime setting, and establishes a strict separation between the two settings.

Abstract

We study how far gradient descent (GD) can be accelerated by predetermined stepsizes in smooth convex optimization. Going beyond the classical $\Omega(n^{-2})$ first-order oracle lower bound of Nemirovsky and Yudin (1983), we prove an $\Omega(n^{-1.6342})$ non-anytime lower bound and an $\Omega(n^{-1.2408})$ anytime lower bound. These improve the recent $\Omega(n^{-1.932})$ non-anytime lower bound of Ma and Chen (2026) and the $\Omega(n^{-4/3})$ anytime lower bound of Tsai et al. (2026), respectively. Both results continue to hold when the stepsizes may be negative. Our anytime lower bound also shows that the $O(n^{-\log_2(1+\sqrt{2})})$ rate of non-anytime silver schedules (Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025; Grimmer et al., 2025) is unattainable in the anytime setting. This establishes a strict separation between the two settings.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

A lower bound for stepsize-based acceleration of gradient descent

This work presents a new lower bound of $\Omega(T^{-1.9319})$ for the last-iterate convergence rate of gradient descent with predetermined nonnegative stepsize schedules, and provides rigorous evidence that stepsize schedules alone cannot accelerate plain GD to the optimal $O(T^{-2})$ convergence rate.

Jian-Hao Ma, Yu-Xin Chen · 8 citations · ⚡2
Preprint Sep 2026

Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent

Stronger lower bounds are established for GD's convergence rate in both settings: $\Omega(N^{-1.450})$ for the non-anytime rate bound and $\Omega(N^{-1.184})$ for the anytime rate barrier.

Min-Chan Jung, Hanseul Cho, Chulhee Yun · 5 citations · ⚡2
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Silver Rate Is (Almost) Optimal for Gradient Descent

Together with the silver-schedule upper bound and the anytime upper bound, the results determine the optimal polynomial convergence exponents in both settings.

Yu-Tian Ye, Kai-Zhao Liu · 3 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

The Complexity of Finding Stationary Points in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

A tight lower bound is proved of $\Omega(\lambda^{1/2}\epsilon^{-7/2})$ for finding points satisfying the recently proposed relaxed notion of $(\lambda,\epsilon)$-stationarity, which allows combining further-away gradients.

Guy Kornowski · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Matching Lower Bounds for Randomized First-Order Methods in Hessian-Lipschitz Nonconvex Optimization

We establish a randomized first-order lower bound for finding an $\epsilon$-stationary point, $\|\nabla f(x)\|\le \epsilon$, of a nonconvex function with initial gap at most $\Delta$, $L_1$-Lipschitz gradient, and $L_2$-Lipschitz Hessian. Each oracle call returns the exact function value and gradient. Let $Q_{\mathrm{r...

Hai-Han Zhang, Wen-Dao Wu, Chen-Heng Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Matching Upper and Lower Bounds for Higher-Order Nonconvex Finite-Sum Optimization

We establish tight randomized higher-order oracle complexity for finding first-order stationary points of nonconvex finite sums. Let $n$ be the number of components, $\Delta>0$ the initial objective-gap bound, $L_p>0$ an individual $p$-th derivative Lipschitz bound, and $\epsilon>0$ the target gradient norm. For every...

Wen-Dao Wu, Hai-Han Zhang, Chen-Heng Zhang et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.