Skip to content
Preprint

Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent

Sep 2026 · 5 citations · ⚡ 2 influential · 21 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

Stronger lower bounds are established for GD's convergence rate in both settings: $\Omega(N^{-1.450})$ for the non-anytime rate bound and $\Omega(N^{-1.184})$ for the anytime rate barrier.

Abstract

The rate-optimal convergence rate of gradient descent (GD) with a fixed step-size is well known to be $\Theta(N^{-1})$ for $L$-Lipschitz smooth convex objectives in the prior art in convex optimization. Surprisingly, several recent works show that we can accelerate vanilla GD by applying a nonconstant, nonadaptive, deterministic step-size schedule. The best-known upper bounds so far in the non-anytime&anytime setups are $O(N^{-1.271})$ [Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025, Grimmer et al., 2023] and $O(N^{-1.119})$ [Zhang et al., 2025], respectively. On the other hand, the best reported lower bounds (or barriers) up to date in the non-anytime&anytime setups are $\Omega(N^{-1.635})$ and $\Omega(N^{-1.241})$ [Ye and Liu, 2026], respectively. We narrow these gaps by establishing stronger lower bounds for GD's convergence rate in both settings: $\Omega(N^{-1.450})$ for the non-anytime rate bound and $\Omega(N^{-1.184})$ for the anytime rate barrier.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

A lower bound for stepsize-based acceleration of gradient descent

This work presents a new lower bound of $\Omega(T^{-1.9319})$ for the last-iterate convergence rate of gradient descent with predetermined nonnegative stepsize schedules, and provides rigorous evidence that stepsize schedules alone cannot accelerate plain GD to the optimal $O(T^{-2})$ convergence rate.

Jian-Hao Ma, Yu-Xin Chen · 8 citations · ⚡2
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov

We study how far gradient descent (GD) can be accelerated by predetermined stepsizes in smooth convex optimization. Going beyond the classical $\Omega(n^{-2})$ first-order oracle lower bound of Nemirovsky and Yudin (1983), we prove an $\Omega(n^{-1.6342})$ non-anytime lower bound and an $\Omega(n^{-1.2408})$ anytime lo...

Yu-Tian Ye, Kai-Zhao Liu · 6 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Improving the Last-Iterate Guarantees of Anytime Algorithms for Stochastic Monotone Variational Inequalities

We analyze a stochastic algorithm with Halpern-type anchoring for constrained convex-concave problems and monotone variational inequalities. This single-loop and single-call algorithm uses one unbiased sample of the gradient operator at every iteration, to be applicable to monotone games with noisy feedback. With $t$ d...

Jun-Hyun Kim, Ahmet Alacaoglu · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The Exact Time-Uniform Rate Frontier for Stochastic Gradient Descent on Smooth Convex Objectives

We study the time-uniform convergence of the raw iterate of standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) for unconstrained smooth convex objectives. We prove that, under standard noise assumptions, the time-uniform convergence rate gets arbitrarily close to $\sqrt{\log n / n}$ but never reaches it. More specifically, we...

Rui-Jie Li, Kang Chen, Tian-Yu Wang · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The First-Order Oracle Complexity of Lipschitz Convex Optimization in Nondual Settings

We study first-order black-box convex optimization over an $\ell_p$-ball for objectives Lipschitz in the $\ell_q$-norm, solving in the affirmative the nonsmooth version of the COLT open question (Guz15b) on whether the geometry of a smaller feasible set ($p<q$) can improve convergence rates in convex optimization, and...

David Martínez-Rubio, Brian Bullins, Cristóbal Guzmán et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.