Aug 2026· Materials Today Bio· Vol 40, pp. 103529· 0 citations· 205 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Innovations in pericardial delivery systems and optimized manufacturing protocols now pave the way for future clinical translation of direct cardiac reprogramming strategies, which could redefine heart failure therapy.
Abstract
Direct cardiac reprogramming, which converts cardiac fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes, has emerged as a promising regenerative strategy for heart failure. Preclinical studies have demonstrated its potential to mitigate adverse remodeling; however, critical challenges remain in delivery precision, reprogramming efficiency, and scalability for clinical translation. Here, we review innovations in delivery systems and microenvironmental engineering aimed at overcoming these barriers. Integration-free viral vectors (e.g. Sendai virus and adeno-associated virus 5) and non-viral platforms (e.g. nanoparticles and modified ribonucleic acid) have shown improved targeting of cardiac fibroblasts and enabled transient reprogramming. In parallel, microenvironmental modulation—such as immune regulation, biomechanical tuning of substrate stiffness, and the use of 3D-bioprinted matrices—has enhanced the survival and functionality of reprogrammed cells. Recent studies emphasize the need to balance genomic safety with delivery efficiency. While viral systems can achieve sustained factor expression, non-viral approaches minimize integration-associated risks. Large-animal models have further demonstrated the role of immune modulation and tissue-specific hydrogels in improving therapeutic retention. Advances in pericardial delivery systems and optimized manufacturing protocols now pave the way for future clinical translation. Nonetheless, unresolved issues—such as the long-term genomic stability of reprogrammed human cells and immune compatibility—still warrant rigorous investigation. By integrating targeted delivery, microenvironmental engineering, and scalable production, direct reprogramming strategies could redefine heart failure therapy. Collaborative efforts to address residual scientific and technical hurdles will determine their potential to benefit the 64 million patients affected globally.
Evidence that cell-type-specific promoters lose fidelity when paired with neurogenic transgene payloads and that published in vivo reprogramming efficiencies may be substantially confounded by promoter leakage in the absence of formal lineage tracing are synthesized.
Mariam Abdelnaby, A. Galiakberova, E. Dashinimaev· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
This review summarizes the trajectory of iPSC reprogramming technologies and identifies the core “translational triltrilas”, namely, the inherent tradeoffs between security, homogeneity, and scalability, and proposes a comprehensive strategy to overcome these bottlenecks.
Mengmeng Chen, Ning Zuo, Qi Wang et al.· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
This review aims to provide actionable guidance to bench-side cell engineering to broad clinical applications by comprehensively discussing recent advancements in LNP formulation and next-generation RNA payload engineering.
Yongjoo Byeon, Nuoya Peng, Eun Bee Oh et al.· Journal of Controlled Releas...· 0 citations
This review discusses how organoids and OoC-based platforms are being leveraged to study and enhance cell fate reprogramming, repair, and regeneration across multiple tissues and outlines current limitations, including scalability, standardization, and biomaterial constraints.
Hrithiha Sriramulu, Hyunsung Woo, Anavi Kaul et al.· Current Opinion in Genetics...· 1 citation
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a versatile platform for regenerative medicine and gene delivery because they combine multipotency, immunoregulatory activity, and injury-directed trafficking. Translation is nevertheless limited by donor- and tissue-dependent heterogeneity, variable biodistribution, and engineering-related risks. This review evaluates genetically modified MSCs as medicinal products rather than as a general MSC class. We compare self-inactivating lentiviral (SIN-LV) transduction, which provides efficient and durable expression and has limited early clinical experience, with targeted genome editing, which can define the integration locus and copy number but remains constrained by variable precise knock-in efficiency, off-target and double-strand-break-associated effects, manufacturing cost, and the absence of long-term clinical safety data. We integrate preclinical and clinical evidence with GMP-compatible manufacturing, potency testing, genomic surveillance, and release criteria. Particular attention is given to safe-harbor integration and B2M/CIITA-based hypoimmunogenic designs as strategies to reduce engineering-related batch variability and HLA-dependent donor variability. Together, these developments support a transition from empirically optimized MSC preparations toward molecularly defined cellular medicines with predefined genotype, expression, potency, and safety attributes.
Kristina V. Kitaeva, I. Filin, A. Rizvanov et al.· Cells· 0 citations