Experimental Assessment of Radar-Based Displacement Measurements Using Laboratory Ground Truth

Abstract

Vibrational monitoring of structures traditionally relies on contact sensors such as accelerometers, displacement transducers, and strain gauges, which provide reliable physical information for structural health assessment. However, these sensors require manual installation and direct access to the structure, resulting in practical limitations in terms of installation time, safety, and accessibility, while long-term maintenance may compromise the overall Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) system reliability. These constraints often hinder the systematic implementation of SHM, particularly for large-scale infrastructures such as bridges. Alternative approaches present complementary limitations: vision-based techniques, such as digital image correlation, are sensitive to lighting conditions, camera calibration, and line-of-sight occlusions, whereas fibre-optic sensing systems, despite their high accuracy and distributed capabilities, require permanent installation and physical integration within the structure, limiting their suitability for rapid or temporary monitoring campaigns. To address these challenges, Ground-Based Interferometric RADAR (GB-InRA) technology has emerged as a promising non-contact alternative for vibration monitoring, enabling safe measurements where visual inspection or contact sensor deployment are impractical. Interferometric radar enables the detection of sub-millimetric displacements by measuring the phase difference between transmitted and received signals. In this context, Real Aperture Radar (RAR), which provides one-dimensional line-of-sight measurements, is typically preferred for vibration monitoring over Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), which enables two-dimensional imaging. Nevertheless, radar-based measurements remain sensitive to instrument-to-target distance and antenna tilt, which must be carefully calibrated to ensure reliable results. In the perspective of bridge monitoring, this work presents an experimental study conducted on a simply supported flexible steel beam (Figure 1). Vibrations were measured using an IBIS-FS microwave interferometric radar and compared against conventional displacement transducers adopted as ground truth. Three corner reflectors were installed at distinct beam locations to enable the estimation of the first three vibration mode frequencies and shapes. Impulsive hammer excitations induced sub-millimetric displacements, allowing a quantitative assessment of radar sensitivity and measurement accuracy. Preliminary results indicate displacement amplitude errors ranging between 0.02 mm and 0.2 mm for reference amplitudes between 0.5 mm and 12 mm, when compared to displacement transducers. Different configurations of vertical tilt and radar-to-target distance were also investigated to evaluate their influence on displacement estimation and modal identification. Overall, the findings demonstrate the effectiveness and practical applicability of GB-InRA as a robust, non-invasive tool for vibration monitoring and modal identification of civil structures.