Aug 2026· Rhinology· Vol 64 4, pp.
434-443
· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
Paranasal sinus distribution in mammals appears more ecologically than phylogenetically determined, with convergent evolution likely influencing their presence and drainage patterns suggest developmental constraints over selective advantages.
Abstract
Background
The evolutionary origin and function of paranasal sinuses remain unclear. We investigated their presence, distribution, and drainage orientation across mammalian orders, to better understand their evolutionary development and roles.
METHODOLOGY
A scoping review of anatomical, radiological, and descriptive literature was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE database (1946-2024). Data on sinus presence, type, and drainage pathways were extracted from representative species across mammalian orders. Phylogenetic (grouping by evolutionary ancestry) and phenetic (grouping by anatomical similarity) analyses were used to identify evolutionary patterns.
Results
Final review included 24 articles. Sinus prevalence in mammalian orders was maxillary (50%), frontal (44%), sphenoid (33%) and ethmoid (20%). Frontal sinuses were more common in behaviorally complex orders (71% vs. 22%). Frontal and maxillary sinuses predominated in terrestrial and arboreal mammals, while aquatic and volant mammals largely lacked sinuses. Phenetic clustering by sinus characteristics often contradicted phylogeny, suggesting parallel evolution driven by environment over ancestry. Despite variation in morphology, drainage pathways remained conserved.
Conclusions
Paranasal sinus distribution in mammals appears more ecologically than phylogenetically determined, with convergent evolution likely influencing their presence. Conserved drainage patterns suggest developmental constraints over selective advantages. Further studies incorporating underrepresented mammalian orders and sinus size quantification are needed to refine our understanding of paranasal sinus function and evolution.
It is suggested that the foramen dorsum sellae relates to developmental variation in dorsum sellae ossification and remodeling in humans and other primates.
Stephanie L. Canington, Zana R Sims, Alexandria L. Sambrano et al.· Journal of morphology· 0 citations
Advances in bee systematics have enhanced our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships among families, subfamilies, and tribes. However, a comprehensive morphological treatment was still lacking in light of current phylogenetic knowledge. In this work, we present the most extensive comparative analysis of the ad...
D. Porto, E. A. B. Almeida· Bulletin of the American Mus...· 0 citations
Insects are phenomenally diverse, yet their evolutionary origins remain poorly understood. The fossil
Rhyniognatha hirsti
from the Early Devonian Rhynie chert (ca. 408 Ma) has been widely accepted as the earliest insect and a crown-group pterygote (flying insect), based on the interpretation of short, dicondylic...
Emma J. Long, G. Edgecombe, M. Koch et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
Abstract
Chondrichthyes, a monophyletic group comprising sharks, batoids, and chimaeras, includes approximately 1200 valid species and displays remarkable morphological diversity, both internal and external. Among soft tissues, the heart and its associated structures in cartilaginous fishes remain understudied, wi...
Maria Clara El Bayeh de Andrade, Karla D. A. Soares· Vertebrate zoology· 0 citations
Simple Summary This study examines the ossa cranii morphology of species in the families Camelidae, Giraffidae, and Bovidae (camels, giraffes, cattle, sheep, and goats) using modern 3D laser scanning and digital modeling. Given the extreme variation in skull size, a qualitative anatomical analysis of bone structure and...
SB Baygeldi, Yeşim Aslan Kanmaz, Hamza Yurttaş· Veterinary Sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.