It is argued that generative AI in TESOL teacher education (TTE) must be reconceptualized to address the risk of teacher de‐skilling and GenAI dependency, and that effective GenAI integration is predicated on teacher competence and professional judgment.
Abstract
This focused article argues that generative AI (GenAI) in TESOL teacher education (TTE) must be reconceptualized to address the risk of teacher de‐skilling and GenAI dependency. Otherwise, teachers may offload professional work onto GenAI before developing evidence‐informed pedagogies and safeguards. Drawing on the five dimensions of professional GenAI competence (P‐GenAI‐C), we outline how TTE programs can organize sustainable teacher learning for the GenAI age. We then offer practical design principles and activities for pre‐service and in‐service contexts, including low‐stakes tool engagement, scenario‐based microteaching, feedback routines, and structured reflection. Across these approaches, we emphasize teacher agency, transparency, and ethical responsibility, including attention to digital exclusion, labor conditions, and environmental impacts. We argue that effective GenAI integration is predicated on teacher competence and professional judgment.
The Responsible AI Literacy in Education (RAIL-Ed) framework is introduced, developed through a systematic review and qualitative framework analysis of 67 studies (2023-2025), grounded in critical, pragmatist, sociocultural, and human-centered traditions.
S. Hossain, S. Ahmadi, Le-Qi Li et al.· 0 citations
Recognition of increasing student diversity highlights the limitations of standards-based models of teacher professionalism. These frameworks often struggle to accommodate complexity, and risk reducing ethical and relational work to technical compliance and measurable outputs, thereby overlooking crucial qualities like...
David Bright, Alexander Kostogriz, Ruth Fielding et al.· The Australian Educational R...· 0 citations
The findings indicate that GenAI does not diminish the teacher’s position; rather, it increases the demands placed on professional judgment, agency, and pedagogical responsibility, and GenAI integration should follow a human-centered approach.
Linh Truong Truong Thi, Hong Nguyen Thi· Dialogues in Humanities and...· 0 citations
The evidence indicates that GenAI can support SRL by functioning as a learning tutor, assisting goal setting and planning, facilitating monitoring and self-evaluation, and improving learning efficiency, and higher-education institutions should combine GenAI access with pedagogical practices that strengthen planning, ve...
It is discussed how, with appropriate guidance, emerging AI‐integrated pedagogical models have the potential to revitalize and sustain language education programs through strategic, teacher‐led use of GenAI.
Jue Wang, K. Davin, Scott Kissau et al.· Foreign language annals· 1 citation
Teacher education should frame GenAI as cognitive support, clarify task-specific boundaries, and require accountable verification rather than allow AI to substitute for learning.
Made Susi Lissia Andayani, L. P. E. Damayanthi· Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pem...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.