Skip to content
Open access

Impact of ICD Presence in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure.

Jul 2026 · Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 0 citations · 11 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Given the substantial burden of ICD-related complications, ICD-management after LVAD-implantation should be individualized according to arrhythmic risk, pacing requirements, procedural risk, and patient preferences.

Abstract

Background

The prognostic relevance of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains controversial.

Objectives

To evaluate the prognostic impact of ongoing use of ICD and associated complications in HF-patients with LVAD-implantation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients (n = 351) who underwent LVAD-implantation and follow up between 2009 and 2021. Patients were categorized according to the presence (n = 254) or absence (n = 97) of ICD. To reduce baseline imbalances between groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, yielding two matched cohorts of 79 patients each. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and ICD-related complications.

Results

Median age was 58 [49-65] years, and 85% were male. Median follow-up duration was 3.6 [2.6-5.7] years. The primary endpoint revealed significantly less events in the ICD cohort (44.3% vs. 59.5% (HR 0.6 95%CI [0.40; 0.97], p = 0.035)). The difference was driven by a higher rate of all-cause mortality (22.08% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.008), while the heart transplantation rate was similar (17.7% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.98). ICD-related complications occurred in 20.4% of all ICD-patients, including 27 lead revisions, 8 complete system removals due to infection, 13 inadequate shocks and 4 hematoma evacuations.

Conclusion

ICD therapy was associated with lower mortality in this single-center LVAD-cohort. However, this finding contrasts with recent meta-analytic. Given the substantial burden of ICD-related complications, ICD-management after LVAD-implantation should be individualized according to arrhythmic risk, pacing requirements, procedural risk, and patient preferences.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Mortality reduction with implanted defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death after Myocardial Infarction: temporal trends in the PROFID study.

In this analysis including a large cohort of post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF, the estimated mortality reduction associated with primary prevention ICD implantation progressively decreased over time.

Alireza Sepehri Shamloo, T. Chiba, J. G. Tijssen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predictive Value of the Electrical Risk Score for Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are essential for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure (HF); however, appropriate shocks increase mortality and impair quality of life. The electrical risk score (ERS) is an electrocardiographic (ECG)-based composite index with proven...

P. Aladağ, Ilke Erbay, N. E. Güdül et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Clinical Characteristics and Real-World Outcomes of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Undergoing ICD Implantation.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is essential for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, real-world data regarding transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) and subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) systems in patients with HCM remain limited.We retrospectively analyzed 279 p...

Yoshiyasu Aizawa, H. Hayashi, Hiroaki Hirayama et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Clinical outcomes and associated factors in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: data from a single-center retrospective registry

Aim. To identify clinical and instrumental factors associated with clinical outcomes in patients with implanted implantable cardioverterdefibrillators (ICD) / cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRTD). Material and methods. A singlecenter retrospective registry included clinical and instrumental...

K. N. Kozaeva, E. Rimskaya, G. Tarasovskiy et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Long-term Mortality and Shock-rate in Patients Surviving Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with and without early implantation of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION In patients who survive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), guidelines for implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are not unequivocal. METHODS Patients resuscitated from OHCA of cardiac cause, without a reversible cause and an expected survival >1 year were identified (year 20...

M. Winther-Jensen, B. T. Philbert, M. L. Laursen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Temporal evolution of clinical event risk after primary-prevention ICD implantation: Chagas vs. non-Chagas dilated cardiomyopathy

Chagas cardiomyopathy was associated with lower composite risk and the wide confidence interval and small population at risk in the late period mean that absence of a detectable difference should not be read as evidence of equivalent risk.

J. P. Guzmán, Pedro Díaz Uberti, Camila Rosello et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.