CAViAR exposes a practical Perception--Reasoning Gap: current VLMs may recognize salient context, but do not reliably map visible agent actions to annotated rule-relevant responsibility categories in safety-critical driving scenarios, and all models degrade sharply on accident type and responsibility reasoning.
Abstract
While modern autonomous driving systems excel at perception tasks such as object detection and trajectory prediction, they lack the high-level causal reasoning required to interpret traffic accidents. In particular, determining responsibility, such as identifying who is at fault and which traffic rule was violated, remains largely unexplored in current benchmarks. To this end, we introduce CAViAR (Causal Accident Video and Incident Analysis Repository), a human-annotated dashcam benchmark comprising 2,249 real-world accident videos collected from CarCrashDataset (CCD) and Nexar. Each video is annotated with structured labels spanning environmental conditions, accident type, causal explanation, apparent At-Fault Agent, affected agent, and apparent rule-violation category. We benchmark state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs), including Cosmos-Reason2, Qwen3-VL, and InternVL3. Once class imbalance is accounted for with majority/random baselines and balanced metrics, perceptual competence is uneven--lighting is nearly solved, whereas weather and road-condition accuracy fall at or below the majority-class baseline---and all models degrade sharply on accident type and responsibility reasoning. Overall, CAViAR exposes a practical Perception--Reasoning Gap: current VLMs may recognize salient context, but do not reliably map visible agent actions to annotated rule-relevant responsibility categories in safety-critical driving scenarios. Code, annotation schema, prompts, and evaluation scripts are available at: https://github.com/nec-labs-ma/CAViAR
Autonomous driving vision-language models (VLMs) struggle in roadwork zones, where familiar visual cues such as lane markings and permanent signs are altered or absent, and temporary devices such as cones and barriers redefine the drivable corridor. VLMs can detect these objects, but without explicit guidance they anchor their reasoning on familiar elements from pre-training and fail to connect work-zone observations to correct planning decisions. We propose WorkDrive, a framework that constructs perception-grounded causal reasoning for work zones and aligns it with trajectory prediction. An automated multitask perception pipeline extracts structured scene facts and injects them into a Chain-of-Causation (CoC) annotation pipeline, redirecting the annotator's attention to domain-specific elements. The resulting reasoning labels are used for supervised fine-tuning, followed by reinforcement learning with a single reward: consistency between lateral meta-actions and the predicted trajectory. On ROADWork, the largest public work-zone dataset, the proposed roadwork CoC reduces trajectory average displacement error (ADE) by 9.0\%, and consistency-based GRPO yields a further 3.0\%, achieving progressive improvement over the trajectory-only baseline. Code and data will be publicly released.
Tianyi Jiang, Wen Zhang, Sihan Yang et al.· 0 citations
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models, Large Language Models, and Multimodal Large Language Models have improved autonomous driving tasks such as scene understanding, decision making, trajectory prediction, and visual question answering. However, evaluating whether these models can reliably reason about safety-critical incidents remains challenging. To address this gap, we present AUTOPILOT-VQA, an incident-centric visual question answering benchmark for dashcam video understanding. The dataset evaluates different systems through structured questions designed around real-world driving incidents and near-incidents. The benchmark covers diverse safety-relevant categories, including weather and lighting conditions, traffic environment, road layout, road surface state, signage, involved entities, accident occurrence, impact location, and avoidability-related reasoning. By requiring models to answer grounded questions about both contextual scene properties and event-level incident details, AUTOPILOT-VQA moves beyond object recognition toward temporally grounded, safety-aware reasoning. The dataset is released as part of the AUTOPILOT CVPR 2026 competition and provides a standardized benchmark for assessing the reliability of autonomous driving systems in different scenarios. Our benchmark support developments for more interpretable, robust, and safety-conscious vision-language systems for real-world autonomous driving.
S. Damodharan, Radhika Gupta, Ali K. AlShami et al.· 0 citations
Reliable visual safety understanding in real-world scenarios demands more than just object recognition; it requires causal reasoning under epistemic uncertainty. While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate impressive semantic alignment on standard benchmarks, they often struggle to distinguish between superficial correlation and genuine forensic logic when grounded in the dynamic, partially observable nature of first-person experiences. Existing evaluations, dominated by third-person surveillance footage and binary classification metrics, fail to expose this cognitive gap. To address this, we introduce EgoSafe-Bench, a benchmark specifically designed to probe forensic reasoning in egocentric safety scenarios. It comprises 12,000 unique evaluation samples, generated by pairing each of the 3,000 video clips with a QA chain governed by our proposed Hierarchical Reasoning Evaluation (HRE) protocol. Unlike standard benchmarks, HRE mandates a rigorous reasoning trajectory from initial feature anchoring to blind-spot deduction and intent inference, thereby enforcing logical consistency and penalizing shortcut-based predictions. Extensive evaluations of state-of-the-art LVLMs (e.g., Qwen3-VL, Gemini, VideoLLaMA 3) reveal a significant perception-reasoning decoupling: models often achieve high descriptive scores but exhibit notable fragility in causal reasoning and logical closure. Our work provides both a challenging dataset and a systematic evaluation framework to foster the development of logically robust video understanding systems.
Yuyun Chen, Tianao Li, TianQuan Feng et al.· 0 citations
Recent studies on multimodal traffic accident understanding have mainly relied on infrastructure-camera footage, satellite imagery, or structured crash records. However, such data sources are costly to deploy and maintain at large scale, and they cannot objectively capture what the driver was actually able to observe before the accident. In contrast, ego-view accident videos directly represent the driver's visual perspective, making them suitable for reasoning about avoidability and driver responsibility. In this paper, we introduce responsibility distribution estimation for ego-view traffic accident videos, a new task in which a model predicts the percentage of responsibility assigned to each involved agent. We construct an LLM-assisted responsibility annotation pipeline and fine-tune multimodal large language models under multiple input settings, including raw frames, segmentation-enhanced input, and textual descriptions. Experimental results establish a strong initial benchmark, demonstrating that multimodal LLMs can effectively perform this nuanced, constraint-based reasoning task. Our findings suggest that ego-centric accident videos provide a promising foundation for socially and legally meaningful multimodal reasoning beyond conventional accident classification and explanation tasks.
We introduce Video-HOCA, a diagnostic benchmark for physical anomaly reasoning in videos. Video-HOCA uses an Ontological-Causal taxonomy to distinguish violations of an entity's own properties or capabilities from violations of physical relations among entities and the environment. It contains more than 1,400 generated and real-world videos and 3,470 question-answer pairs, with human verification of labels and reference answers. The benchmark evaluates four levels of reasoning: plausibility checking, anomaly attribution, fine-grained recognition, and open-ended physical explanation. Across 20 Instruct-mode Video-LLMs, we find that recognition outpaces explanation: Task I scores cluster at 75-88, while Task II macro-F1 stays mostly below 50. We also find that the Ontological-Causal gap depends on the task and model configuration, and that Thinking-mode gains are not explained by sampling or output budget alone. Annotation agreement, Task-IV human-judge and judge-judge checks, alternative metrics, and temporal/decoding controls validate the evaluation pipeline and bound the claims supported by the benchmark.
Chang Liu, Yunfan Ye, Qingyang Zhou et al.· 0 citations
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in recent years and are increasingly integrated into safety-critical systems such as autonomous driving vehicles. However, when deployed in real-world environments, their robustness to common input corruptions remains a major challenge for safety assurance. Corruptions such as motion blur can change the outputs of DNN-based semantic segmentation models and, more importantly, cause unsafe system-level decision inconsistencies, for example by failing to identify ground obstacles that are correctly recognized under clean conditions. In this paper, we present a testing-oriented robustness repair approach for semantic segmentation models in real-world industrial settings. We first use corruption-based testing to reveal decision-level failures under realistic perturbations, and then repair the model through a combination of data augmentation and self-training using only unlabeled data. Rather than focusing solely on pixel-level prediction changes, our method targets the reduction of system violations while preserving decision behavior on clean inputs. We evaluate the approach on a semantic segmentation model used in an industrial product. Experimental results show that our method significantly reduces system violation rates while maintaining system-level decision-making accuracy, demonstrating the practical value of testing-guided repair for safety-critical deployment.
Minggu Wang, Zhi-Yong Zhou, Fuyuan Zhang et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations