This work proposes NTEP-R (NTEP Reward), a supervision mechanism ensuring that each tool invocation strictly advances the reasoning process toward the final solution, and introduces a non-repeated-goal regularizer to penalize redundant calls that revisit satisfied NTEP goals.
Abstract
Modern vision-language models (VLMs) can directly answer many image-grounded questions, yet they often struggle with complex queries requiring fine-grained visual details or external knowledge. To acquire this missing evidence, agentic VLMs invoke tools such as image cropping, image search, and text search. However, existing training paradigms primarily evaluate tool-use based on final answer correctness, leaving evidence acquisition and utilization insufficiently supervised. This leads to two critical shortcomings: (i) models frequently issue redundant or off-target tool calls that fail to gather necessary evidence, and (ii) even when appropriate tools are called, models often fail to extract the necessary information from the resulting observations. To address these limitations, we introduce the NTEP (Necessary Tool-Evidence Path), a novel annotation scheme that explicitly specifies the essential external evidence and corresponding tool calls for each query. Building upon this, we propose NTEP-R (NTEP Reward), a supervision mechanism ensuring that each tool invocation strictly advances the reasoning process toward the final solution. Specifically, our approach rewards the agent for aligning its pre-call intent with a necessary evidence-seeking goal, and for ensuring the information summarized from the post-call observation aligns with the necessary evidence. Furthermore, we introduce a non-repeated-goal regularizer to penalize redundant calls that revisit satisfied NTEP goals. Extensive evaluations on seven image-grounded benchmarks demonstrate that our 8B-parameter instantiation, NTEP-8B, significantly improves both search-oriented accuracy and tool-use efficiency within a unified three-tool framework. These results highlight the critical value of fine-grained tool-evidence path supervision for training robust agentic VLMs.
This work proposes a fine-grained alignment framework that couples dense reward signals at the data level with precise credit assignment at the algorithmic level to prevent response-level shared advantages from allowing local hallucinations to compromise all other valid outputs within the same response.
Xing-Ming Long, Jie Zhang, Yue-Cong Min et al.· 0 citations
The contrastive evidence gap is formalized, the per-token log-likelihood ratio that a model assigns to its own output when conditioned on a question-relevant region versus an irrelevant one, and it is shown that the gap is complementary to the model's own confidence.
Santiram Tiwari, N. Naik, Devbrat Pandey et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces ToolCompass, a post-training framework that guides tool trialing by organizing tool-call representations according to shared functions and jointly reduces intra-function variation across domains and increases inter-function separation.
Jun-Lin Fang, Chong-Chong Zhang, Do Nguyen-Thanh et al.· 0 citations
Locator-Critic (LOCI) is proposed, a training-free framework that decouples visual search from evidence verification and improves accuracy for both open-weight models like Qwen3-VL and proprietary models like Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Walid Bousselham, Mathilde Caron, Arsha Nagrani et al.· 0 citations
Results show that process priors are most useful when aligned with the scene's specific decision boundary, motivating boundary-aware prior selection for process-grounded visual reasoning.
Yu-Yang Dai, Bo-Fei Huang, Hong-Bo Zhang et al.· 1 citation
This work proposes ToolSearcher, a novel RL framework for effective multi-turn search and fine-grained optimization in large-scale tool selection, which introduces category-constrained tool discrimination to improve the model's ability to distinguish functionally similar tools.
Zhen-Long Dai, Xu-Jie Song, Zi-Tong Wang et al.· 0 citations