Sep 2026· Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Agentic AI for Next-Generation Software Development· 0 citations· 40 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This paper argues that architectural choices influence not only the functionality and performance of MAS but can also promote value-oriented system behavior, laying the foundation for a unified set of architectural patterns and guidelines towards the design of trustworthy MAS.
Abstract
The emergence of agentic AI and LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) presents unprecedented opportunities for automating complex tasks, while simultaneously raising critical concerns about the preservation of fundamental human-centered values, such as privacy, fairness, and safety. Although software engineering has traditionally focused on functional correctness, the adoption of LLMs and AI agents into complex socio-technical systems has intensified the need for responsible software engineering and robust value alignment. In MAS, architectural design decisions, such as coordination mechanisms, communication protocols, and system topologies, play a central role in shaping system behavior and the outcomes they produce. This paper argues that architectural choices influence not only the functionality and performance of MAS but can also promote value-oriented system behavior. Therefore, we investigate how different architectural designs support different human-centered values, discussing the following value-preserving architectural patterns: (i) a privacy-aware architecture with a federated topology, (ii) a distributed architecture to promote pluralism and diversity, and (iii) a guard-agent architecture to detect and mitigate unfairness. Finally, we introduce representative use cases to illustrate the proposed architectures in real-world scenarios. By linking architectural design with human-centered values, this work lays the foundation for a unified set of architectural patterns and guidelines towards the design of trustworthy MAS.
A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 1 citation
This position paper argues that EBRB could serve as a core safety and reasoning governor within LLM-based agentic pipelines, yielding hybrid systems to better align agentic AI systems with emerging regulatory and ethical requirements for Trustworthy AI (TAI) in high-risk settings.
Jun Liu, Chris D. Nugent, De-Hu Yu et al.· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
This is the first paper from POLIS, an ongoing research programme studying algorithmic institutions for multi-agent systems, and asks which parts of an AI institution produce safety and how they do it.
A comprehensive framework for the design, evaluation, and responsible deployment of Agentic AI is proposed, emphasizing safety, explainability, human-in-the-loop supervision, and ethical compliance and aims to maximize the benefits of Agentic AI while minimizing potential risks.
Nitin S. Shrirao, Dnyaneshwar S. Jadhav, Sarita B. Patil· Recent Trends in Mathematics· 0 citations
The analysis indicates that the promise of LLM-based agents for scalable automation, collaborative reasoning, and complex workflow execution comes with significant challenges in long-horizon reliability, evaluation standardization, communication security, cost-efficient orchestration, governance, and the interpretabili...
N. Mohamed, Prasun Chakrabarti, S. Gupta· Journal of Smart Algorithms...· 0 citations
This paper proposes the Evaluation Context Protocol (ECP), an early-stage, vendor-neutral framework intended to act as a portable evaluation contract layer for agentic systems and describes an open-source reference implementation that includes adapters for LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, and PydanticAI.