Sep 2026· International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems· Vol 19· 0 citations· 53 references
TL;DR
This position paper argues that EBRB could serve as a core safety and reasoning governor within LLM-based agentic pipelines, yielding hybrid systems to better align agentic AI systems with emerging regulatory and ethical requirements for Trustworthy AI (TAI) in high-risk settings.
Abstract
Agentic AI based on large language models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving from static chatbots to autonomous systems that plan, act, and interact with tools in open-ended environments. However, current LLM agents lack calibrated uncertainty, robust safety mechanisms, and faithful explanations, making them ill-suited for safety-critical settings such as healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, and industrial operations. Extended Belief Rule Bases (EBRB) are representative examples of interpretable, rule-based probabilistic reasoning frameworks with explicit representation of belief and ignorance, and have been successfully applied in complex decision problems without suffering from the rule explosion that affects traditional rule-based approaches. This position paper argues that EBRB could serve as a core safety and reasoning governor within LLM-based agentic pipelines, yielding hybrid systems to better align agentic AI systems with emerging regulatory and ethical requirements for Trustworthy AI (TAI) in high-risk settings. We outline: (i) a conceptual architecture integrating LLMs with EBRB in agentic workflows; (ii) the mapping from this architecture to TAI dimensions including transparency, uncertainty, safety, fairness, and auditability; (iii) concrete opportunities across healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, and industrial safety; and (iv) a research agenda highlighting open challenges in scalable rule induction, co-adaptation between LLMs and EBRB, and evaluation of hybrid agents. Our goal is not to present empirical benchmarks, but to articulate a vision and roadmap for EBRB-enhanced agentic AI that is both powerful and trustworthy.
A formal framework for security in agentic AI is developed, built around an ideal predicate ϕ that decides, for a given ( prompt, context, result ) triple, whether the agent’s behaviour is acceptable.
F. Durak, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner· 0 citations
A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
It is argued that accountable, ethical AI is not a governance overlay applied after deployment but an architectural property that requires encoding ethical commitments as explicit, contestable constraints rather than as emergent properties of trained weights.
L. Medsker, Sumit Virmani· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate...
Ajay Vohra, Tao Chen, Neeti Narayan et al.· 0 citations
This paper argues that architectural choices influence not only the functionality and performance of MAS but can also promote value-oriented system behavior, laying the foundation for a unified set of architectural patterns and guidelines towards the design of trustworthy MAS.
A. Pesare, Tommaso Dolci, Katja Hose et al.· Proceedings of the 1st Inter...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.