This work introduces Latent Energy Action Planning (LEAP), which treats the complete action horizon as a differentiable variable and optimizes it through a frozen LeWorldModel (LeWM) through a frozen LeWorldModel representation and predictor.
Abstract
Latent world models support efficient model predictive control from high-dimensional observations, yet optimizing a single learned latent objective can favor action sequences whose decoder-predicted terminal descriptor does not match the goal descriptor. We introduce Latent Energy Action Planning (LEAP), which treats the complete action horizon as a differentiable variable and optimizes it through a frozen LeWorldModel (LeWM). LEAP couples terminal latent goal matching with a terminal-window state energy. Low energy requires the predicted terminal latent to agree with the goal latent and the decoder-predicted terminal descriptor to agree with the goal descriptor. A frozen goal-conditioned proposal initializes the search, a quasi-Newton solver refines actions through the autoregressive rollout, and post-optimization projection enforces the admissible action range. Across four control domains using the officially released LeWM checkpoints, the complete LEAP planning system raises mean success from 77.5% for LeWM planned with the cross-entropy method (LeWM+CEM) to 94.8% under a matched protocol, a 17.3-percentage-point improvement, while retaining the frozen LeWM representation and predictor.
PSG-JEPA is proposed, a physically grounded JEPA world model that shapes its latent space with two complementary grounding objectives beyond forward prediction: grounding individual latents in robot proprioceptive state, and grounding latent pairs in multi-horizon joint-angle changes.
The Dual-Latent World Model is introduced, which separates local execution and long-range planning through distinct state representations and dynamics models and proposes Long-Horizon Representation Learning with Weighted Rollout (LoRe), which supervises self-generated predictions at both levels.
De-Ling Zhao, Zheng-Rong Yue, Shao-Bin Zhuang et al.· 0 citations
Hydra, a discrete World Action Model that tackles this by establishing a unified latent manifold over visual states, physical poses, and control actions, outperforms state-of-the-art navigation world models in goal-directed planning, while matching or exceeding the closed-loop execution capabilities of leading reactive...
Mohammad Nazeri, Alexandyr Card, S. Huber et al.· 2 citations
This work presents LeFlow, which learns a reusable latent trajectory prior operating directly in the latent dynamics space from the world model, and argues that latent world models should support not only prediction but reusable planning priors.
Hsiang-Wei Huang, Jian-Xu Shangguan, Junbin Lu et al.· 5 citations
AD-WM, an action-discriminative joint-embedding world model for counterfactual MPC, is introduced, which combines residual latent dynamics with predictor-level action-recovery regularization, using inverse dynamics and a normalized recovery objective motivated by conditional mutual information.
Jia-Bin Qiu, Zi-Xuan Chen, Hong-Ye Cao et al.· 1 citation
This work studies action-conditioned predictors built on five frozen self-supervised visual backbones, finding that a world model guides action selection reliably only when the goal lies within, or slightly beyond, the trajectory it imagines during planning.
A. Alrasheed, Basim Azam, Naveed Akhtar· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.