A benchmark isolates whether planned delivery is warranted by the record before waveform evaluation or listener studies are used, and recommends a deterministic verifier for source-grounded speech planning.
Abstract
Expressive speech systems have to decide how an utterance is delivered before any waveform is rendered. In dialogue agents, narration, and role-conditioned TTS, that planning step sets affect, pitch, energy, rate, pause, emphasis, and stance, yet standard audio metrics rarely show whether those choices were actually licensed by the source record. This leaves a practical evaluation gap: a system may sound plausible while relying on a memorized script instead of the cue that governs delivery. VoxReason casts this pre-synthesis step as a listener-free task for source-grounded speech planning. Systems output a source-cited speaking plan, and a deterministic verifier checks citation legality, slot agreement, unsupported state, schema validity, and one-cue counterfactual locality. On 1,440 checked source-label cases, shortcut controls show why slot accuracy alone is unsafe: a key-lookup oracle reaches 1.000 plan-slot accuracy on seen keys, while an emotion prior still reaches 0.958 slot accuracy on source-key-disjoint cases without citing intensity or identity. In a separate 100-case learned source-key-disjoint comparison, a 7B locality SFT+CF repair improves plan-slot accuracy/locality from 0.684/0.141 to 0.919/1.000, and removing source records lowers citation-required grounded score by 0.488. The resulting benchmark isolates whether planned delivery is warranted by the record before waveform evaluation or listener studies are used.
Plan accuracy alone cannot show whether a speech-delivery decision follows its source: a fixed prior may match the original label yet fail to respond appropriately when a cue changes. VoxReason provides a 100-case verifier benchmark that holds each utterance fixed, edits one designated source-label cue, and scores cite...
This work presents AVERT, which scores each candidate value by combining cross-turn agreement with a trained audio-conditioned verifier and resolves the three error types with three operators, vote, add, and swap, each restricted to the slots where its error is common.
When a language model receives two conflicting documents as input, how does it decide which one to prioritize? Does it rely on how the sources are framed or the presentation order of the documents? We evaluated this behavior on Google's pre-trained Gemma 4-e4b model across a targeted behavioral suite (n = 13 items, 784...
Hear2Act is introduced, a unified evaluation protocol for text and spoken assistants with 480 persona-grounded scenarios, hidden user concerns, and objectively verifiable outcomes that show that prosody matters when lexical evidence is insufficient, and that audio-capable LLMs can recover information from speech but do...
Xin-Yi Liu, H. Nayyeri, Dilek Hakkani-Tur et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
VoiceLongMemEval (VLME) benchmark, where every answer depends on paralinguistic metadata attached to conversational turns, which is otherwise unrecoverable from the words alone, is presented.
This paper applies speech act and politeness theory to a corpus-pragmatic analysis of 2,000 English-language prompts drawn from publicly shared ChatGPT conversations, showing a consistent movement toward indirect, implicit, and fragmentary realizations of directive force, accompanied by a decline in politeness marking.
Kristina Šekrst, Virna Karlić· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 27, 2026
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.