TEmBed is introduced, the Tabular Embedding Test Bed, a unified benchmark for systematically evaluating tabular embeddings across four representation levels: cell, row, column, and table and shows that which model to use depends on the task and representation level.
Abstract
Tabular foundation models aim to learn universal representations of tabular data that transfer across tasks and domains, enabling applications such as table retrieval, semantic search and table-based prediction. Despite the growing number of such models, it remains unclear which approach works best in practice, as existing methods are often evaluated under task-specific settings that make direct comparison difficult. To address this, we introduce TEmBed, the Tabular Embedding Test Bed, a unified benchmark for systematically evaluating tabular embeddings across four representation levels: cell, row, column, and table. Evaluating a diverse set of tabular representation learning models, we show that which model to use depends on the task and representation level. Our results offer practical guidance for selecting tabular embeddings in real-world applications and lay the groundwork for developing more general-purpose tabular representation models.
An initial approach that first aligns heterogeneous table-cell representations into a shared space using Hirschfeld–Gebelein–Rényi maximal correlation (HGR) is proposed, and it is found that it generalizes competitively compared to models specifically designed for individual tasks.
It is found that the optimal backend choice differs between column and row attention and varies across hardware as well as model specifics: While the FlashAttention implementations tailored for each GPU generation perform overall best, they are at times outperformed by CuDNN in the case of column attention at longer se...
Maximilian Schambach, Clemens Biehl, Sam Thelin· 0 citations
This review is, to the authors' knowledge, the first organised around the current generation of tabular foundation models, and taxonomises the architectures by pretraining regime, maps the capability space across five axes, isolates the language-model-on-tabular strand for prediction, feature engineering and generation...
S. Kurashkin, V. Tynchenko, Alexey S. Borodulin et al.· Machine Learning and Knowled...· 1 citation
TabFM-Auto is introduced, which pairs a tabular foundation model, TabFM, with a language model agent that evolves the data pipeline around it, and ranks first overall among MLE agents.
Deqing Fu, Huang-Yuan Su, Rajat Sen et al.· 1 citation
TabFM, a 400M-parameter tabular foundation model that formulates supervised tabular prediction as in-context learning, produces calibrated zero-shot predictions in a single forward pass without task-specific tuning.
Wei-Hao Kong, Erez Louidor Ilan, Shu-Xin Nie et al.· 17 citations· ⚡4
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for machine learning on tabular data, offering the ability to generalize across datasets without task-specific training. Since many machine learning datasets can be represented as tables, this raises the question: does TFM capability extend...
Goran Nakerst, John Brennan, W. Beugeling et al.· 0 citations
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.