VisCAD is presented, a foundation model suite designed to provide both broad generalization and strong CAD capability for realistic industrial products that includes a domain-specific harness that leverages frontier models for complex assembly generation and demonstrates advantages over general-purpose harnesses in both quantitative and qualitative evaluations.
Abstract
AI-assisted computer-aided design (CAD) for industrial products involves two challenging phases. Part-level generation maps diverse forms of user intent, including renders, text descriptions, 2D drawings, and real photographs, to executable programs in a CAD domain-specific language. Assembly-level generation must additionally handle interacting parts, plan mating relations, estimate poses, and place all parts correctly. Existing specialized CAD models are commonly trained on narrow input domains, such as renders or texts, and often generalize poorly, while general-purpose frontier models cover broader inputs but perform inconsistently across CAD domains. We present VisCAD, a foundation model suite designed to provide both broad generalization and strong CAD capability for realistic industrial products. At its core is VisCAD-M1, a 27B model trained through mid-training and post-training for part-level design generation. On PubCADBench and RealCADBench, VisCAD-M1 achieves the highest average part-level score among the evaluated models, reaching 0.5540 compared with 0.5496 for the strongest frontier model. Reusing VisCAD-M1 as a test-time verifier can further raise the score to 0.5797, an approximately 5 percent relative improvement over the previous state of the art. VisCAD also includes a domain-specific harness that leverages frontier models for complex assembly generation and demonstrates advantages over general-purpose harnesses in both quantitative and qualitative evaluations.
Results show that execution alone is insufficient to characterize realistic CAD modeling and that frontier models and agents differ substantially across executability, IoUs, and visual-semantic identity.
Guan-Ling Li, Zhi-Chao Huang, Hui-Mu Yu et al.· 0 citations
It is found that weaker agents often fail before producing a valid artifact, whereas stronger agents increasingly fail on structural, geometric, and construction-process requirements, and CADWorld exposes a gap between general GUI competence and reliable execution of persistent, verifiable engineering workflows.
Zi-Han Dong, Yuan-Zhe Liu, Zhi-Yuan Ma et al.· 1 citation
MechReason is a benchmark derived from real mechanical engineering papers, comprising 12k question-answer pairs with explicit reasoning-chain annotations and 21k visual materials spanning nine evidence types, including statistical charts, parameter tables, engineering drawings, microscopic images, simulation images, sy...
Tengyue Wang, Kang An, Chenxu Du et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces FLOORA (Floor Layout Optimization with RL Alignment), a family of small domain-specific language (DSL) models for architectural layout generation that outperforms much larger frontier models, and suggests that similar domain-specific recipes may be useful in other engineering domains with structure...
S. Rezaei-Shoshtari, Patryk Wozniczka, Shu Ishida et al.· 0 citations
The results show that CAD evaluation must test engineering behavior rather than appearance alone, while editing supplied CAD is substantially easier than generating it, while complex edits and matched FEA remain difficult.
MIRAGE-CAD maps each input to a shared construction representation and mediates program generation through an explicit construction-plan interface and shows that executable validity, geometric fidelity, and parametric responsiveness can diverge substantially and should therefore be evaluated separately.
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.