Across cardiac, prostate and brain MRI shifts, CARD lowers calibration error in 45 of 49 comparisons against the strongest baseline in each setting, and maps the temporal aggregate of this disagreement to a temperature field applied per pixel across all classes, so that confidence changes while the segmentation does not.
Abstract
Probability calibration aligns model confidence with predictive accuracy, enabling clinicians to identify unreliable segmentation regions. This alignment breaks down under domain shift, where artifacts and unseen protocols produce confident errors. Existing post-hoc methods adapt the correction at test time, conditioning on predictive entropy, the logit pattern, or augmentation response, but each proxy is read from the terminal prediction, the very quantity that shift corrupts. This motivates reliability evidence beyond the terminal prediction, which categorical diffusion provides in two ways. First, a generative shape prior keeps a capacity-limited reference intact when appearance is corrupted, so its disagreement with the primary segmentor highlights primary-model errors. Second, every reverse step yields a class distribution, separating persistent disagreement from transient discrepancy. Aggregated over the trajectory, this disagreement correlates with Dice at 0.788, against 0.521 for a matched discriminative control. We therefore propose CARD (Calibration via Agreement in Reverse Diffusion), which maps the temporal aggregate of this disagreement to a temperature field applied per pixel across all classes, so that confidence changes while the segmentation does not. Across cardiac, prostate and brain MRI shifts, CARD lowers calibration error in 45 of 49 comparisons against the strongest baseline in each setting.
In real-time colonoscopy, ground-truth annotations are unavailable at inference, so polyp segmentation models can fail silently. We propose Referee-Based Quality Estimation (RBQE), a reference-free framework measuring agreement between a primary segmentation model and an independently trained referee on the same image....
The results demonstrate that the proposed "plug-and-play" evidence-guided framework for reliable medical image segmentation generally achieves a more consistent, spatially coherent uncertainty representation that better aligns with the true error, providing a practical tool for quality control and risk awareness in cli...
Chaojie Xing, Haolin Zhan, Ren-Cheng Song et al.· Medical Image Analysis· 0 citations
Common segmentation losses aggregate errors voxel-wise, so lesions influence the objective in proportion to their volume, giving small but clinically critical lesions disproportionately little weight. Instance-aware losses aim to address this mismatch by assigning each lesion its own term. However, blob loss and CC-Dic...
Luc Bouteille, F. Jonske, J. Kleesiek et al.· 0 citations
This work reframe FSMIS as a three-layer sequential decision problem, state six hypotheses with an explicit dependency order, and proposes a minimal pilot that can falsify the foundational self-assessment claim before a clinician study.
Supervised synthetic CT (sCT) generation is commonly trained and evaluated as voxel-wise regression against registered reference CT images. In practice, MRI-CT and CBCT-CT pairs are aligned through registration procedures that leave residual misalignments. These residuals are not independent intensity noise but spatial...
Valentin Boussot, C. Hémon, C. Lafond et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.