Aug 2026· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· 0 citations
TL;DR
Current literature on AI integration into design courses is reviewed, capturing best practices and proposals for AI scaffolding, and pedagogical framing, specific activities, student guidelines, and instructor observations of engagement patterns across year levels are described.
Abstract
Generative AI is transforming how engineers conceptualize and evaluate design ideas, presenting both opportunities and risks for engineering education. This practice-based paper reviews current literature on AI integration into design courses, capturing best practices and proposals for AI scaffolding. It then describes practical experiences integrating conversational AI into undergraduate engineering design courses at the University of Ottawa, from first-year introductory design through fourth-year capstone projects. AI tools were introduced incrementally, supporting ideation, scenario exploration, critique of alternatives, and structured feedback, alongside instruction in prompt design, critical evaluation, and ethical considerations. The paper describes pedagogical framing, specific activities, student guidelines, and instructor observations of engagement patterns across year levels. Faculty observed that early reluctance and superficial use gave way to broader design exploration and more precise design rationale with sustained, guided practice. Challenges include managing expectations, variation in prompting skill, and maintaining student agency.
This phenomenological study examines graduate students’ lived experiences using GenAI as a thinking partner in a fully online master’s-level instructional design course at a regional public university in Florida, highlighting how GenAI mediates reflection, authorship, and learning in authentic design environments.
M. Stork, Krista Bixler· Florida Journal of Education...· 0 citations
Students’ selective and context-dependent AI use can be interpreted as boundary-setting around when and how AI participates in the design process, and value is suggested in a judgment-centered, process-based approach to AI pedagogy that emphasizes accountability and reflective decision-making.
M. B. Huh, Alp Tural, Elif Tural· Education sciences· 0 citations
Engineering-driven
STEM
pedagogy promotes integrative problem-solving through the engineering design process (
EDP
), but its implementation is constrained by curriculum integration, assessment alignment, and instructional workload. Recent advances in generative
AI
(GenAI) create possibilities for design-base...
Jing-Yu Lu, Xiao-Fei Zhou· Research in Integrated STEM...· 0 citations
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, is reshaping engineering education. This study, part of a broader investigation into stakeholder perceptions of generative AI in engineering education, examines engineering students’ experiences with generative AI, focusing on their percep...
The findings indicate that students are already using Gen AI across multiple stages of the design project learning process, extending beyond core design activities, such as generating and visualising ideas, to include project preparation, such as interpreting project briefs, and the communication of outcomes.
Di Wang, Ping-Fei Jiang, Yi-Li Quan et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.