Jul 2026· Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning· 0 citations
TL;DR
To conclude, ChatGPT is a useful and supplementary type of feedback compared to the one provided by a teacher because it helps to foster self-confidence and self-reliance in a student when editing the drafts.
Abstract
The research has four constructs, including perceived usefulness, trust and accuracy, motivation, and behavior intention, which indicate the perceptions of EFL students regarding ChatGPT as a feedback tool in English writing. The mixed-methods design was used to collect data (N = 254) on surveys and open-ended responses. Quantitative methods (descriptive statistics, reliability, regression, and mediation) indicated that ChatGPT was the most useful tool in general in enhancing the grammar, organization, and clarity of readers. Its performance was impressive, but it was also inconsistent with its accuracy, as it had gaps in contexts that arose occasionally. The regression proved that perceived usefulness, trust, and motivation were all helpful predictors of behavioral intention and that motivation mediated usability. This was supported by the qualitative results, which focused on the immediacy and supportiveness of ChatGPT. To conclude, ChatGPT is a useful and supplementary type of feedback compared to the one provided by a teacher because it helps to foster self-confidence and self-reliance in a student when editing the drafts.
This paper aims to investigate the benefits and drawbacks of ChatGPT in the context of EFL writing in Saudi Arabia. Forty-seven university students were selected to participate in the study voluntarily. To combine the depth of qualitative responses with the breadth of quantitative data, they responded to a survey and follow-up interviews. The dataset included both quantitative and qualitative data, which strengthened the scope of analysis. The findings showed that the participants perceived ChatGPT as a helpful tool for improving grammatical structures and vocabulary. Nonetheless, there is less impact on motivation and confidence. Perceptions varied by gender, discipline, and experience with use. The frequency of use strongly correlated with the perceived usefulness of ChatGPT. The interview yielded results supporting ChatGPT’s role in enhancing writing accuracy, organization, and self-confidence. Findings also raised some concerns about the output generated by ChatGPT and its potential for overreliance. Based on the findings, the study suggests teacher training on the responsible use of AI tools for writing skills. Some implications and areas of further research were also put forward at the end of the study.
A. Alqahtani, Ghazwan Mohammed Saeed Mohammed· World Journal of English Lan...· 0 citations
Providing effective feedback is central to the development of academic writing skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study investigated Vietnamese university students’ perceptions of and preferences for ChatGPT, peer, and teacher feedback in writing revision. Questionnaire data were collected from 110 third-year English majors and followed by semi-structured interviews with 10 purposively selected participants. Descriptively, teacher feedback received the highest composite rating (M = 4.15, SD = 0.49), whereas ChatGPT feedback was valued for availability and peer feedback for collaboration. Independent-samples t-tests showed no statistically significant differences between students with prior ChatGPT experience and first-time users across the five composite scores (all p > .05). The only significant correlation was between feedback preferences and integration/future use (r = .274, p = .004). Qualitative findings showed that teacher feedback was trusted despite timeliness concerns, ChatGPT was appreciated for immediacy but questioned for complex academic tasks, and peer feedback was constrained by face-saving concerns. Most participants supported combining all three sources and requested explicit training. The findings support systematic feedback literacy instruction, culturally responsive peer-review training, and guided AI use in writing courses.
T. Nguyen, Xuan Quan Nguyen· Computer-Assisted Language L...· 0 citations
The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT is changing the nature of academic writing by providing support in generating ideas, developing content, revision and editing. Although writing with AI offers benefits, little is known about its impact on learners’ writing strategies and motivation. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study examines the relationship between competence, autonomy, and relatedness in academic writing in the context of ChatGPT usage. This quantitative study involved 126 respondents from higher educational institutions. A 43-item Likert-scale questionnaire adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017) and Youssef et al. (2024) was used to collect data. The questionnaire was based on three constructs: autonomy, relatedness, and competence and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .937). Data were analysed using descriptive, inferential, and correlation analyses in SPSS. Results show positive perceptions of using ChatGPT in improving academic achievement, critical thinking skills, and the motivation of students. Moreover, participants used metacognitive, cognitive, and effort-regulating writing strategies frequently. ChatGPT is a potential scaffold for supporting learners’ writing development, but it also motivates them by increasing their competence, autonomy, and relatedness.
Julina Munchar, T. A. Buhari, Sharifah Shahnaz Syed Husain et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, has transformed academic writing in higher education by supporting idea generation, drafting, revision, and language improvement. However, limited research has examined learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT across different stages of the writing process. Therefore, this study investigated learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT use, their perceptions of the planning, translating, and reviewing stages of writing, and the relationship between ChatGPT and these stages. This quantitative survey study involved 186 tertiary students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a 43-item five-point Likert scale questionnaire adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017) and Youssef et al. (2024), comprising three sections: demographic profile, writing process, and ChatGPT. The findings revealed that learners generally perceived ChatGPT positively and reported positive perceptions towards all three writing stages. Correlation analysis showed a moderate significant positive relationship between ChatGPT and planning, as well as weak significant positive relationships between ChatGPT and translating and reviewing. The findings suggest that ChatGPT functions as a complementary tool that supports learners throughout the writing process while preserving the importance of cognitive and strategic writing behaviours. The study provides insights for the effective and responsible integration of ChatGPT in higher education writing instruction.
Izlin Mohamad Ghazali, Hidayu Shafie, Nurul Nadiah Dewi Faizul Ganapathy et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Findings carry pertinent pedagogical implications, suggesting that higher education practitioners should systematically integrate AI scaffolding into writing instruction to enhance self-regulated learning and writing behaviors.
Amirah Athirah Amir Yazid, N. Hasni, M. S. Y. Shak et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
In the digital age, artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly used to support writing practices. Grounded in David McClelland‘s Theory of Needs (1965), this study explores writing strategies used by university students as well as their motivational needs to use ChatGPT. The study is based on the notion that by understanding what motivates students to write can inform teaching practice as well as how academic institutions currently expect students to use AI tools. This study employed a quantitative survey approach involving 150 undergraduate students from a public university in Malaysia. The instrument consisted of a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire containing 43 items adapted from established studies on writing strategies and ChatGPT usage. The adapted instrument demonstrated satisfactory validity and strong internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from .804 to .940. Findings reveal statistically significant differences in the needs of writers by gender (p = 0.005) but not by discipline (p = 0.085). This indicated that all three motivational needs were positively met by the students, showing moderate high levels of engagement. The Need for Achievement had strong positive correlations with Need for Power (r =. 602, p <. in the Present, Need for Autonomy (r = 01) and Affiliation (r =. 568, p <. 01). These results imply that achievement-oriented students are also more likely to self-regulate their effort and socialise with writing behaviour of others, which indicates an inter-related motivational profile. This study has large implications for writing teachers, and curriculum developers, suggesting that the interplay between motivational needs and AI tool usage should be considered when designing writing instruction.
Nur Huslinda Che Mat., Nur Maizura Lin, Suzana Hamzah et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations