Neutrino oscillations establish that neutrinos are massive, providing the only laboratory detection of physics beyond the Standard Model. Direct kinematic experiments bound the electron-neutrino mass to $m_{\nu_e}<0.45$ eV (KATRIN, 90% CL), implying $\sum m_\nu \lesssim 1.3$ eV. Conversely, cosmology within $\Lambda$CDM is highly constraining: Planck CMB, CMB lensing, and DESI DR2 BAO yield $\sum m_\nu<0.056$ eV (95% CL), in 2-3$\sigma$ tension with the inverted-ordering floor (0.10 eV). However, this bound relies on $\Lambda$CDM, while data hint at an evolving dark energy. To determine the model dependence of cosmic neutrino mass bounds, we deconstruct each probe's sensitivity to late-time physics and pursue two robust routes to a $\sum m_\nu$ bound: (i) The existing dark-energy-marginalized route, retaining all data and marginalizing over $(w_0, w_a)$, is shown to also be immune to flexible binned and cubic $w(a)$ histories, yielding $\sum m_\nu<0.152$ eV, sharpening to $\sigma(\sum m_\nu) \approx 0.043$ eV with Simons Observatory lensing and Spec-S5 BAO. (ii) A new late-Universe-free route combines primary CMB, marginalizing over acoustic-peak smoothing via $A_{\rm lens}$, with the reconstructed lensing spectrum $C_L^{\kappa\kappa}$, removing late-time expansion dependence by construction. This yields $\sum m_\nu<0.41$ eV today, tightening to 0.31 eV (Simons Observatory) and 0.28 eV (cosmic-variance limit) across all tested dark-energy models. These relaxed bounds trade statistical power for model independence. Interestingly, they land in the sensitivity range targeted by next-generation laboratory experiments like Project 8 ($m_{\nu_e} \sim 0.1$ eV), motivating vital synergies between future cosmological and terrestrial neutrino measurements.
XENONnT has measured a low-energy solar-neutrino signal dominated by $pp$ neutrinos. At these energies, an ultra-small pseudo-Dirac mass-squared splitting induces detectable active-sterile oscillations over the Sun--Earth baseline. We study pseudo-Dirac oscillations of the first mass eigenstate, compute the resulting m...
The true nature of neutrinos--whether Dirac or Majorana--is a foundational, unresolved question. We demonstrate that the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB) offers an untapped avenue to resolve this issue, provided neutrino magnetic moments are $\gtrsim 10^{-14}\mu_B$. The intense magnetic fields characteristi...
Marco Manno, Pablo Martínez-Miravé, I. Tamborra· 1 citation
We report on the first measurement of low-energy solar neutrinos through elastic neutrino-electron scattering in a dark matter experiment, establishing the lowest energy threshold for any neutrino detection to date. The measurement utilizes data from the first two science runs of XENONnT, corresponding to an exposure o...
X. C. E. Aprile, J. Aalbers, K. Abe et al.· 2 citations· ⚡1
The neutrino-matter interaction cause the final flavor compositions deviating from those expected in vacuum. In this work we consider neutrinos interact with ultra-light scalar dark matters $\phi$ ($m_\phi\ll 1\,{\rm eV}$). When the neutrinos emitted from a distant source and propagate through the dark matter medium, t...
We investigate the potential of Higgs cascade decays to probe neutralino dark matter below the neutrino floor in the semi-constrained Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with nonuniversal gaugino masses. We focus on lightest-neutralino masses of 65 to 100 GeV and study the process $pp\to H_2\to A_1A_1\to\gamm...
Ya-Bo Dong, Kun Wang, Hai-Jun Yang et al.· 0 citations
Conventional wisdom says that neutrino oscillations measure only mass-squared differences and not the absolute neutrino mass scale. This is true, however, only at leading order in the expansion parameters $m_i/E$, the ratios of the neutrino masses $m_i$ ($i=1,2,3$) to the neutrino energy $E$. At next-to-leading order,...
Gustavo F. S. Alves, A. de Gouvêa, Joshua Kaler et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.