MMTClinic is presented, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning and question-answering tasks involving clinical time-series and reveals notable differences in model performance across tasks, languages, and modalities, highlighting current limitations in clinical reasoning capabilities.
Abstract
Time-series data in clinical settings is crucial for capturing dynamic changes in a patient's health over time, enabling timely diagnosis, personalized treatment, and early detection of critical events. However, the development of clinically reliable and linguistically inclusive medical AI systems remains a significant challenge, primarily due to the lack of multimodal, multilingual, and time-series-grounded benchmarks that reflect the complexity of real-world clinical scenarios. To fill this gap, we present MMTClinic, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning and question-answering tasks involving clinical time-series. MMTClinic combines text, medical images, and multivariate physiological signals and includes 30,000 QA pairs (15,000 multiple choice questions (MCQs) and 15,000 open-ended questions) across five languages: English, Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, and Tamil. These questions cover three important clinical tasks---mortality prediction, heart rate forecasting, and SOFA score estimation. We evaluate 13 state-of-the-art LLMs in zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought settings. Our evaluation reveals notable differences in model performance across tasks, languages, and modalities, highlighting current limitations in clinical reasoning capabilities. MMTClinic provides a valuable resource for advancing multilingual, multimodal, and time-series-aware medical AI research. The dataset will be made publicly available on successful acceptance of the work.
A comprehensive survey of various benchmark datasets used in medical LLM tasks, focusing on various aspects of medical knowledge such as electronic health records, doctor–patient dialogues, medical question answering, and medical image captioning, is presented.
L. K. Yan, Qian Niu, Ming Li et al.· Medicine Advances· 34 citations· ⚡1
This work introduces MedReaMM, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate models'ability to synthesize heterogeneous clinical evidence consisting of detailed patient histories alongside multiple medical images into accurate differential diagnoses under a complete-information paradigm.
Lai Wei, Yu-Chao Chen, Zhenbiao Cao et al.· 0 citations
The benefits of multimodal data integration are task-dependent and healthcare LLMs should examine clinical data modalities according to specific tasks for efficient integration, and provide practical guidance for designing efficient clinical decision support systems.
Cheng Peng, Mengxian Lyu, Ziyi Chen et al.· JAMIA Journal of the America...· 0 citations
Background Most large language models (LLMs) have achieved passing scores on medical licensing examinations. However, most evaluations focus on single-question accuracy, overlooking performance on multistep patient management scenarios, such as making a diagnosis followed by a treatment plan. It is unclear if LLMs can...
Jia-Xue Cha, Yan Zhao, Hui Zong· JMIR Medical Education· 0 citations
The proposed M2G-LLM (Multimodal MedGraph-LLM), a novel framework that enhances LLMs with multimodal integration and alignment via Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), highlights the promise of combining the language understanding of LLMs with the relational reasoning capabilities of GNNs for comprehensive, multimodal healthc...
Inyoung Choi, Sukwon Yun, Jia-Yi Xin et al.· 0 citations
Uncommon and off-guideline cases are difficult for clinical decision support, because physicians must make a series of management decisions under diagnostic uncertainty and rarely see the full case at once. Most large language model (LLM) benchmarks for medicine score only the final diagnosis, yet much of clinical care...
Ofir Ben Shoham, O. Perets, Nir Grinberg et al.· 0 citations