A longitudinal analysis of generative-AI-related discussions in the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) GitHub repository, using 43,806 candidate issues created between January 2021 and June 2026, suggests that GitHub Issues provide a practical, workflow-oriented perspective on generative AI that complements survey-based studies of developer perceptions.
Abstract
Generative AI tools such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and coding agents have rapidly become part of everyday software development, yet little is known about how mainstream open source communities discuss them in practice. This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of generative-AI-related discussions in the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) GitHub repository, using 43,806 candidate issues created between January 2021 and June 2026. To improve corpus quality, we combined keyword retrieval with semantic relevance filtering, yielding a filtered corpus of 25,227 AI-related issues. We applied BERTopic to the retrieved corpus to identify discussion topics, using the filtered corpus for theme validation and a robustness re-clustering, and analyzed their evolution over time using monthly prevalence and Mann-Kendall trend tests. The results show that developer discussions are dominated by practical concerns regarding the operation of AI-assisted development environments, including agent management, configuration, reliability, authentication, and billing, whereas risks frequently emphasized in survey-based studies, such as hallucination and licensing, rarely surface in this venue. This suggests that discussions of generative AI in the VS Code issue tracker primarily focus on operational aspects of AI-assisted software development. Furthermore, discussions evolved from AI-assisted code completion toward conversational and agent-based development, reflecting the increasing integration of generative AI into software development workflows. These findings suggest that GitHub Issues provide a practical, workflow-oriented perspective on generative AI that complements survey-based studies of developer perceptions.
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) programming assistants has raised questions about the actual benefits they provide in professional software development. This exploratory longitudinal case study compares configurations of three AI programming assistants (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Cursor)—specific c...
Goran Đambić, Anton Maurovic, Ivana Ogrizek Biškupić et al.· Information· 0 citations
It is concluded that generative AI does not eliminate the need for human code review but requires a redesign of its role and proposes a four-layer verification architecture comprising deterministic automated verification, AI-assisted contextual verification, independent human technical review, and human accountability...
Usman Karim· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
AI-generated code (AIGC) from autonomous coding agents are widely adopted across the software development lifecycle. However, AIGC also introduces critical challenges to open-source community governance, making AIGC detection important. Existing AIGC detection benchmarks are fundamentally misaligned with real-world dev...
Wen-Tao Chen, Yu-Fei Chen, Hui-Qun Yu et al.· Proceedings of the 41st IEEE...· 0 citations
This study compares the structural quality of code produced by three widely adopted vibe coding tools --- Lovable, v0, and Replit --- starting from a single generation prompt and suggests that choosing between vibe coding tools involves structural trade-offs that go beyond perceived productivity.
AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and OpenCode have matured into capable multi-step software engineers, yet nearly all of them still assume a developer is sitting at a terminal. PromptBridge removes that assumption by connecting six messaging platforms, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Microsoft Teams, GitH...
Tripti Singh, Dolly Verma, Parineeta Jha· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
Many developers face the challenge of managing repetitive tasks and maintaining productivity. This book will help you tackle both these challenges with Amazon Q Developer, a generative AI-powered assistant designed to optimize coding and streamline workflows. This book takes you through the setup and customization of A...
Behram Irani, R. Sonawane· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 22, 2026
“X-Hinges” helps design and 3D print items like lamps and gloves with an interactive twist: automatically embedded sensors that perceive and adaptively respond to human contact.
StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026