Skip to content
Review Open access

When and why are negotiators overly pessimistic? The psychology of under-trust innegotiation.

Aug 2026 · Current Opinion in Psychology · Vol 73, pp. 102399 · 0 citations · 42 references
Medicine

Abstract

Research on negotiation has devoted considerable attention to the risks of misplaced trust, particularly the possibility that negotiators may be exploited by deceptive counterparts. Less attention has been given to the opposite form of trust miscalibration: under-trust, and particularly, unwarranted pessimism regarding counterparts' honesty. This review focuses on such undue distrust and proposes a misperceived motivations account to explain its emergence. According to this account, negotiators' excessive distrust stems from an asymmetry between the motives that negotiators attribute to their counterparts and the motives that actually guide those counterparts' behavior. When deciding whether to behave honestly, negotiators are driven not only by self-interest but also by concerns about moral self-image and anticipated moral emotions, which constrain dishonesty. However, when deciding whether counterparts are honest, negotiators assume that their counterparts are primarily motivated by self-interest and fail to foresee the constraining moral-identity concerns. We integrate evidence from the literature on negotiation, trust, and moral psychology to explain why pessimism is especially likely to emerge and persist in competitive bargaining contexts, highlight circumstances that may attenuate or amplify it, and identify implications for theory and research, alongside practical inferences for fostering truthful disclosure and credible honesty in negotiation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

The Selective Moralism Trap: Trust, Legitimacy, and Sovereignty in the Contestation of the Liberal International Order

Background and Aims: This conceptual review article examines why accusations of Western double standards have become a durable frame in the contestation of the liberal international order. Existing international-relations scholarship has explained this contestation mainly through changes in material power, norm diffusi...

F. Verri · 0 citations
Case report Open access Sep 2026

Is It a Lie If I Don’t Know? Mechanisms and Mitigation of Dishonesty Under Ignorance

Ignorance of facts and laws may provide an excuse for self-serving reporting behavior, even at the risk of telling the untruth. This paper examines what decision-makers report when they do not know their true entitlement to a financial gain, why they do so, and how the resulting dilemma under ignorance can be mitigated...

Sven A. Simon · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Fear, Blame, and Deservingness: The Moral Economy of AI-Labor Anxiety on Reddit

Public concern about artificial intelligence and labor markets is documented through surveys, media analyses, and workplace research. This article examines how such concern is organized in sampled Reddit discussions through moral evaluations of fairness, responsibility, deservingness, and institutional accountability....

Anania Iordache, C. Rughiniș, R. Rughiniș et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Signalling and Moral Ambiguity

Moral agents often act under conditions of informational asymmetry: while they may know that their actions are permissible, observers may lack the information needed to reach the same conclusion. This paper explores the ethical significance of such asymmetries. Drawing inspiration from Signalling Theory, I introduc...

Claire Benn · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Trust as a precondition for compassionate leadership: a discourse analytical perspective

This paper examines how trust shapes the enactment and retrospective evaluation of compassionate leadership through the analysis of leaders’ real-time retrospective negotiations. Through interactional analysis of leadership meetings in a Turkish manufacturing firm, it shows that compassionate leadership is a relati...

Christina Efthymiadou · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Serving the Group, Breaking the Rules: Which Leadership Dimensions Shield Leaders From Ingroup Punishment for Moral Transgressions?

Ingroup members often grant leaders leniency after moral transgressions, yet literature has not provided clear causal evidence about which leadership attributes most effectively buffer punitive responses. Although some studies have suggested that such transgression credit primarily stems from leaders’ identity prot...

Fatih Bayrak, M. S. Uysal, Sinan Alper · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.