This work traces spillover to geometric entanglement of steering directions, captured by their Gram matrix, and derives a zero-cost correction from an activation-norm-penalized objective that decouples each direction's contribution exactly.
Abstract
Activation steering controls LLM behavior at inference time by adding learned directions to hidden states, but existing methods handle one concept at a time. Pluralistic alignment, where different stakeholders need different value emphases, requires steering multiple dimensions simultaneously. We show that naive steering produces substantial spillover: the effect intended for one value leaks into others. This parallels the treatment-versus-spillover decomposition in causal inference. We trace spillover to geometric entanglement of steering directions, captured by their Gram matrix, and derive a zero-cost correction from an activation-norm-penalized objective that decouples each direction's contribution exactly. Our end-to-end pipeline requires no fine-tuning, no reward model, and no manual prompt engineering: given only domain questions, it automatically discovers value dimensions, extracts directions, diagnoses entanglement, and applies corrected steering. On climate discourse, the correction improves the net steering effect from +5.9% to +14.0%, validated over 100,000 pairwise judgments.
Steering Vector Dissection is proposed, a framework to explicitly isolate individual and semantically consistent features from these composite directions that tend to entangle multiple semantic and stylistic concepts into a single composite direction, leading to unpredictable steering effects.
Takeru Hiramatsu, Kyohei Atarashi, Koh Takeuchi et al.· 2 citations
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings where responses must reflect multiple, potentially interacting social norms and human values. Activation steering offers a lightweight alternative to training-based alignment by modifying internal activations at inference time. However, prior human-valu...
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in alignment-sensitive contexts, activation steering has emerged as a lightweight, inference-time alternative to fine-tuning methods (e.g., RLHF, DPO) for behavioral control. However, existing work typically validates steering on isolated behaviors, leaving it u...
Mohammad Mahdi Abootorabi, Armin Saghafian, Ali Bazshoushtari et al.· 0 citations
Value steering should change an LLM's normative priorities while preserving the scenario, facts, and task constraints underlying its answer. Conventional activation edits often change both. We introduce an editable semantic-value interface on frozen residual states, with a one-way semantic-to-value pathway that grounds...
Jia-Le Dai, Hong-Can Deng, Liu-Xian Ma et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces Cross-Encoding Steering Evaluation, which freezes an intervention while re-encoding answers to the same held-out items, which favors extraction-index over semantic-label following on NormBank in three models.
Zhiwei Gao, Shaowen Peng, Shoko Wakamiya et al.· 1 citation
Reasoning-Induced Misalignment, where fine-tuning on reasoning data containing no harmful content, including mathematics, code, and problem-solving with chain-of-thought traces can induce harmful behaviors of LLM, posing a serious challenge to the safety of LLM reasoning. Cross-architecture, cross-scale, and cross-data...
Yipeng Zhao, Qi-Shun Yang, Shenzhe Zhu et al.· 0 citations
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.