This work develops a unified taxonomy of memory mechanisms and reviews three classes of external memory, including explicit modules, retrieval augmentation, and agentic stores, under a common framework for what is retained, how it is written and accessed, and how it persists.
Abstract
Deep learning for time series has progressed through successive architectural paradigms, from recurrent networks and transformers to structured state-space models, retrieval-augmented predictors, foundation models, and tool-using agents. These developments are typically studied in isolation, organized by architecture or modeling era. We argue that they can instead be viewed through a common question of \emph{how does a time-series model retain and access information beyond its immediate input?} This question is motivated by a fundamental limitation of conventional time-series modeling: information relevant to a prediction may lie far beyond a feasible input window, while compressing history into a fixed-size state can discard information that may become useful later. We formulate this challenge as a \emph{memory} problem and organize existing time-series methods along a spectrum from internal memory, encoded in parameters and fixed-size states, to external memory that is addressable, retrievable, and increasingly maintained by agents. We then develop a unified taxonomy of memory mechanisms and review three classes of external memory, including explicit modules, retrieval augmentation, and agentic stores, under a common framework for what is retained, how it is written and accessed, and how it persists. A cross-cutting analysis maps these mechanisms to time-series tasks and identifies gaps in both methods and evaluation. We conclude by outlining open problems in building memory systems that can selectively retain, retrieve, revise, and forget information as temporal environments evolve. The result is a framework for studying memory as a first-class dimension of time series modeling, independent of the underlying backbone.
Test-time memorization of sequential information is a foundational capability for any intelligent system that needs to rapidly store and retrieve data, as demonstrated by the attention mechanism in large language models. However, Transformers and linear attention variants are trained via backpropagation through time (B...
Recurrent neural networks typically compress information into a single vector-valued recurrent state, forcing short-term computation and long-term retention to share the same representation. Past extensions alleviate this bottleneck by increasing the memory capacity or separating timescales, but lack the combination of...
Ciaran Regan, K. Arulkumaran, L. Darlow et al.· 0 citations
Deep learning models, particularly recurrent neural networks and their variants, such as long short-term memory, have significantly advanced time series analysis. These models capture complex, sequential patterns in time series, enabling real-time assessments. However, their high computational complexity and large mode...
Nilushika Udayangania, Kishor Nandakishora, M. Palaniswami· 0 citations
A novel pattern-guided mixture-of-experts that expands model capacity through sparse activation and uses shallow patch similarities to constrain deep-layer routing, guiding expert specialization across heterogeneous time series and an implicit quantile network head that predicts arbitrary quantiles to characterize pred...
Xingjian Wu, Chen-Juan Guo, Xiangfei Qiu et al.· 0 citations
Results indicate that freezing the pretrained backbone and training lightweight projection and adapter modules provides a favourable accuracy--efficiency trade-off with stable behaviour across varying context lengths.
Tamanna S. Kumavat, Georg Brunner, Kyriakos Flouris· 0 citations
Time-series carry structure simultaneously at multiple scales (fine-grained variation, mid-range motifs, and global properties) and downstream tasks operate at correspondingly different scales. Most existing self-supervised learning approaches supervise representations globally via instance-level contrastive losses and...
T. Stangeland, A. Köhler, S. Mæland et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.