Skip to content

Privacy-Preserving Gaze Interaction: Reducing Re-Identification Without Degrading Utility

Nov 2025 · 3 citations · 29 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A dual-assessment framework is introduced that scores any real-time gaze transformation on two axes at once: interaction utility, measured through an offline gaze-interaction simulation and an operational spatial-accuracy metric, and privacy preservation, measured through the Rank-1 Identification Rate of a state-of-the-art re-identification adversary.

Abstract

Gaze-based interaction is emerging as a standard input modality on consumer extended-reality (XR) devices. Yet each gaze input constitutes an involuntary biometric disclosure, as the same signal that selects a button can also identify the user who produced it. Reducing identity information without degrading interaction is difficult: most prior methods are validated on small datasets or optimized for only one of the two competing objectives. We introduce a dual-assessment framework that scores any real-time gaze transformation on two axes at once: interaction utility, measured through an offline gaze-interaction simulation and an operational spatial-accuracy metric, and privacy preservation, measured through the Rank-1 Identification Rate (IR) of a state-of-the-art re-identification adversary. We test the framework on 23 conditions: one raw baseline and 22 privacy variants from eight lightweight signal-processing families using two publicly available datasets (GazeBase and GazeBaseVR). Deterministic operators produce no significant change in identity on either dataset, because a subject-invariant mapping preserves the relative geometry a biometric embedding exploits. Identity drops sharply only when identity-uncorrelated randomness is injected per sample. Smoothing applied afterwards to recover signal quality partially restores identifiability on both datasets. The best-balanced configuration reduces the Rank-1 IR by 64.3 percentage points on GazeBase and 67.9 points on GazeBaseVR, while leaving target-selection success essentially unchanged on both datasets. Privacy-preserving gaze interaction is therefore not zero-sum. However, the reduction in identifiability is achieved by injecting randomness rather than by improving signal fidelity.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Hidden In Plain Gaze: Gaze Representations as Privacy Controls for Utility and Re-identification Risk in XR

This work studies whether gaze data representation choice can serve as a lightweight privacy control at feature extraction, before adding perturbation or formal privacy mechanisms, and compares three gaze representations under matched model capacity.

Cory Ilo, Brendan John, Doug A. Bowman · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Formal Guarantees for Securing XR User Status in Streams of Eye-Tracking Data

Formal guarantees which bound how reliably an attacker can accurately identify the user's saccades (rapid eye movements) that leak information about the user's status are presented; and this bound is linked to the level of noise injected by a sample-level Gaussian noise privacy mechanism.

Miguel Angel Lopez, Anish S. Narkar, J. Michalak et al. · 0 citations
#computer vision Preprint Sep 2026

EyeMakeYou: Identity-, Task-, and Subjective-State-Conditioned Diffusion for High-Frequency Gaze Synthesis

Eye movement biometrics (EMB) is an emerging behavioral modality for user authentication, particularly in virtual- and augmented-reality systems, where gaze dynamics contain distinctive subject-specific features. However, robust EMB systems require diverse, high-quality gaze recordings that are expensive to collect and...

Kamrul Hasan, Mehedi Hasan Raju, Oleg V. Komogortsev · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Gaze-Based Interaction on Commodity Hardware: A Survey of Appearance-Based Estimation, Selection Techniques, And Multimodal Error Correction

Eye gaze is the fastest natural pointing signal available to interactive systems, but for three decades accurate gaze interaction has remained tied to dedicated infrared eyetracking hardware. The convergence of deep appearance-based gaze estimation, ubiquitous front-facing cameras, and on-device neural inference has op...

Zia Rasheed, Darda Rahman, Mehmoona Akram · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

The Lens Is Not the Problem: Understanding Potential Privacy Risks and User Concerns in AI Glasses

AI glasses are emerging as one of the fastest-growing categories in consumer wearables, embedding always-on cameras, microphones, and cloud-connected multimodal assistants. Yet these same sensors can continuously capture audio, video, and biometric signals from both wearers and nearby people, routing much of that data...

Mohammed Aldeen, Jing-Wen Yan, Zi-Xun Xiong et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Lensless Gaze Is Not Private by Default: Auditing Identity Leakage Across Disclosure Surfaces

Lensless near-eye sensing is often described as privacy-friendly because its coded measurements are visually unintelligible. Yet visual unintelligibility reflects human interpretation, not what a learned adversary can recover. We therefore treat identity privacy as a systems property of disclosure surfaces: representat...

Rahul Vimalkanth, Kaushik Mitra · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.