This work aims to advance the development of socially desirable embodied agents in open-domain environments by extending the concept of proactive assistance to Social Proactive Intelligence (SPI), characterized by diverse scenarios, social understanding, and robot-centric behaviors.
Abstract
Embodied agents represent a prominent research focus across both academia and industry. The prevailing paradigm has gradually shifted from reactive assistance, which requires explicit user queries, to proactive assistance, capable of recognizing human needs and offering support without explicit instructions. Nevertheless, existing studies on proactive assistance remain confined to narrow scenarios and primarily emphasize task completeness, whereas real-world agents must operate in open-domain environments while adhering to social expectations. To bridge this gap, we extend the concept of proactive assistance to Social Proactive Intelligence (SPI), characterized by diverse scenarios, social understanding, and robot-centric behaviors. We further introduce RobotEQ, a dedicated benchmark for SPI. We first define two tasks: behavior judgment, emphasizing global contextual understanding, and spatial grounding, focusing on local perceptual details. Building on these tasks, we construct RobotEQ-Data, a dataset comprising 1,812 synthetic and 223 real-world scenarios, 7 social facets, 22K+ human annotations, 3K+ behavior judgment questions, and 3K+ spatial grounding questions. Furthermore, we establish RobotEQ-Bench to evaluate the performance of representative models. Experimental results demonstrate that current models fall short of achieving reliable SPI. Further analysis reveals that incorporating external social knowledge yields consistent improvements. This work aims to advance the development of socially desirable embodied agents in open-domain environments.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.