Skip to content
Open access

SMOTE-Stack-XAI: An Explainable Stacked Ensemble Learning Framework Integrating Random Forest, XGBoost, SVM and Deep Neural Networks for Real-Time Credit Card Fraud Detection

Aug 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · 0 citations

TL;DR

SMOTE-Stack-XAI, a stacked ensemble framework that uses the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance, outperforms the RF, hybrid RF-SVM, and hybrid SVM-LR baselines with an accuracy of 99.3%, precision of 99.2%, recall of 99.4%, and F1-score of 99.3%.

Abstract

Credit cards are now the primary tool for digital transactions due to the quick expansion of e-commerce and cashless payment ecosystems. As a result, fraudulent activity has grown proportionately, resulting in significant financial losses for banks, retailers, and cardholders. On the benchmark European cardholder dataset, the authors' previous work investigated single-model Random Forest (RF) classification, a hybrid RF-SVM voting scheme, and a hybrid SVM-Logistic Regression (LR) scheme, with accuracies of 96.6%, 98.0%, and 98.2%, respectively. Despite their effectiveness, these methods are nonetheless susceptible to the dataset's high class imbalance (0.17% fraud), depend on a tiny number of base learners, and offer fraud analysts and regulators no way to evaluate their conclusions. By proposing SMOTE-Stack-XAI, a stacked ensemble framework that (i) uses the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance, (ii) combines four heterogeneous base learners—Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Deep Neural Network (DNN)—through a Logistic-Regression meta-learner, and (iii) integrates SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to reveal the transaction-level features that influence each fraud decision. The suggested framework is assessed using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and AUC on the same dataset of 284,807 European cardholder transactions. According to experimental results, SMOTE-Stack-XAI outperforms the RF, hybrid RF-SVM, and hybrid SVM-LR baselines with an accuracy of 99.3%, precision of 99.2%, recall of 99.4%, and F1-score of 99.3%. It also produces human-interpretable, feature-level explanations for each prediction, making the model appropriate for real-time, auditable fraud-detection pipelines.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Mitigating Financial Fraud: A Hybrid SMOTE-Tomek and Stacked Ensemble Model Approach

The study introduces a Stacked Logistic Regression ensemble to combine the predictive capacity of optimized Random Forest and XGBoost base classifiers and reveals that the proposed stacked model performance surpasses both individual base models.

Uduh Israel Akakoh, G. N. Edegbe · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Card Fraud Detection: Cost-Sensitive Evaluation and Model Selection

Abstract The rise in online transactions has made credit card fraud a significant global concern, necessitating detection strategies that are both highly accurate and practically viable. While existing literature extensively explores machine learning techniques to address class imbalance, most studies optimize for trad...

Xin-Yue Fan, T. Boonen · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Temporal Evaluation of Gradient Boosting and Autoencoder Models for Credit Card Fraud Detection

Payment card fraud losses exceeded US$33 billion worldwide in 2022, yet fraud detection models are often summarized by accuracy values that conceal how much fraud they miss. This study compares a Naive Bayes baseline, three gradient boosting libraries (LightGBM, XGBoost and CatBoost), an autoencoder anomaly detector, a...

Arnav Thakur · 0 citations
#explainable ai Open access Sep 2026

Explainable Fraud Detection AI System in Financial Sector

The study shows that ensemble models on the original feature space provide highly accurate and stable fraud detection on this dataset and SHAP analysis reveals that source and destination balances, transaction amount and type are the most influential features.

Merit Chinonso Opara · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Comparing Machine Learning and Soft-Voting Ensemble Models for Credit Card Fraud Detection in Imbalanced Transaction Data

Credit card fraud detection is a highly imbalanced classification problem in which headline accuracy can be misleading. In the held-out Kaggle test file used in this study, only 2,145 of 555,719 transactions (0.386%) were fraudulent; a classifier that labeled every transaction legitimate would therefore achieve approxi...

Christian Barravecchio · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection through Data Preprocessing and SMOTE-Based Class Balancing: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models

This study compares the performance of several supervised machine learning models for fraud detection, using a unified data preprocessing pipeline, and found that ensemble learning methods generally outperform single classifiers in both accuracy and minority-class recognition.

Nafiu Yahuza, Ahmad Baita Garko, Abubakar Atiku Muslim et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.