Skip to content

Searching for New Physics with Reinforcement Learning

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 23 references
Physics Computer Science

TL;DR

An RL method that can be used to efficiently search for NP at the level of SMEFT, and test it on the CDF $W$-mass anomaly, and show that it reproduces (and improves upon) known results.

Abstract

Finding new physics (NP) is the most important problem in particle physics today. Studying ``anomalies'', i.e., measurements of low-energy observables whose values disagree with the predictions of the Standard Model (SM), is a powerful search strategy. The SM Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) provides a general model-independent framework for parameterizing NP; it is natural to try to find the SMEFT operator(s) that can explain such anomalies. This is a challenging task because (i) the number of SMEFT operators is enormous, and (ii) at loop level there are very complicated correlations among the operators. Analyses by humans typically rely on phenomenological intuition to decide which operators are relevant. This is often biased and does not explore the complete SMEFT operator space. Interestingly, reinforcement learning (RL) techniques excel at tasks that require decision making to achieve their goals. In this paper, we introduce an RL method that can be used to find the SMEFT operators that explain any anomalies. We test it on the CDF $W$-mass anomaly, and show that it reproduces (and improves upon) known results. We then consider a far more complicated situation with multiple anomalies and show that, even here, this method is able to find the SMEFT operators that explain the data. Our RL method can therefore be used to efficiently search for NP at the level of SMEFT.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Searching for BSM Experimental Signatures with Large Lagrangian Models

The search for physics Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) is generally limited not by the supply of theory descriptions but by the lack of discriminating experimental observations. A case in point is dark matter, where the overwhelming gravitational evidence only goes so far in distinguishing between models within a vast...

Ibrahim Elsharkawy, V. Knapp-Pérez, W. Bhimji et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

New Observables for Resonant and Non-Resonant New Physics Searches at Colliders

The discovery of the Higgs boson cemented the Standard Model of particle physics (SM) as we know it and observations have so far confirmed SM predictions. Now, too many beyond-the-Standard-Model (BSM) models can be explored to overcome the remaining shortcomings of the SM. As a result, generic models present a useful i...

Julien Touchèque · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Conference Sep 2026

Online Robust Reinforcement Learning Through Monte-Carlo Planning

A new robust variant of MCTS that mitigates dynamical model ambiguities to bridge the gap between simulation-based planning and real-world deployment and empirical evidence is provided that this method achieves robust performance in planning problems even under significant ambiguity in the underlying reward distributio...

Tuan Dam, Kishan Panaganti, Brahim Driss et al. · 5 citations · ⚡1
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Hierarchical Reasoning Rewards: Minimax-Optimal Rates with Transformers

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a standard tool for post-training language models on reasoning tasks, where the policy is updated by reward feedback while exploring the space of responses. Despite its empirical success, theoretical understanding of RL post-training remains limited, in particular of why on-policy...

Naoki Nishikawa, Taiji Suzuki · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

CDRL: Certification-Driven Reinforcement Learning for Neutrino Flavor Model Discovery

Many scientific discovery problems require searching combinatorial hypothesis spaces under complex domain constraints. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising approach, but existing methods rely on scalar rewards that provide limited information about why candidate solutions fail, leading agents to repeatedly ex...

Piyush Jha, Jake Rudolph, V. Knapp-Pérez et al. · 3 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.